culture are created and that the government has a positive role to nurture that pluralism, that kind of principled pluralism. so i do think there are some deep political philosophic agreements behind this that are not going to be solved by dealing with the details of cases. how do we deal with pluralism in an increasingly diverse society? very carefully. at the end of the day, i think there needs to be humility and there needs to be empathy. the word empathy is derided in some circles when lawyers say it, but i think it s important. i think it s important on both sides. we are a diverse society. we have people with diverse views, and we can t always get everything we want. sometimes we should get what we want and sometimes we shouldn t. i think what has disturbed me and many of my colleagues about the weaponization of religious freedom restoration act he said rfra. i did say rfra. when i m at church, if i want to pray with only people of the same race and religion a
idea. either keeping fema out of it or keeping fema in dhs but more robust would be a better idea. secret service could have been used opportunity to split secret service into two different agencies. right now they have a dual mission. that dual mission is very confusing for people in secret service monetary investigations and protecting the president and other officials. those are two you know, unrelated missions. so i think other things could have been done maybe not quite as extreme as what we got. i m sorry. we re out of time. we had a good discussion. there is no doubt that this issue of homeland security is an important issue for our country. the organization of government changed. the way that we looked at government changed as a result of it and you heard a challenge here today. if you don t like what you see, get involved with it. thank you all. thanks to the panelists for being here. we appreciate everything. thank you. [applause] hillary clinton makes first tri
several nato allies provide for instance training and support to ukraine. i think there is a european challenge a global challenge, and a chance in which nato is addressing. when it comes to article five the important thing is that nato stand ready to protect and defend our rights against any threat. and for instance cyber threats, important thing we did as the lost gate, was to decide that cyber attacks can trigger article five; collective defense. because regarding cyber as dangerous as a conventional attack is important. and therefore we are developing our capabilities to respond. partly to the tech who is behind our main responsibility is to defend our own nato networks with teams, capabilities, exercises and so we are increasing our readiness for cyber defense. and we are also developing their own capabilities through cyber attempts. and as always, every attack is there but we ought to trust that nato will respond to the correct way, if and when needed whatever kind of a
we have disagreed about aspects of the application of first amendment principles to situations from campaign-finance to the regulation of political speech but agreed about hate speech and centrality of the american tradition. and both mark and bill talked about something we have seen throughout the state, that there is a real value to bringing people to disagree fundamentally together. as those of us on the stage and in the audience are, listening respectfully to each other, so we can identify areas of agreement and disagreement. your job, ladies and gentlemen is to go have a drink, which you have earned, but to answer the question i just raised to the panelists. think about what each of you will do over the next year to celebrate freedom, participate in debates about it, and encourage other americans the same to do the same. this is about self education. educate yourself. you have to learn about the ordinance on all sides of these debates so you can make informed decisions
even if there is not an immediate lifting of the sanctions. on the pnd, i can tell you the , french are keen of having we re not going to let the pnd issue under the carpet. the negotiations, for the moment, obviously they are not moving forward quickly. it means that the iranians make the calculation that it could be easier to get concessions from the ministers with some dramatization. a good deal of dramatization. it is also theater. there are some theatricals in negotiation. really, don t listen to the outside declarations. the sanctions will be lifted in an incremental, reversible conditional way. each side will have to be able to prepare its public for the opinion. peter: i think he was mindful of protocol. it contains provisions that provide for access to military science. i think where mindful of that protocol. peter: there is that, there are also proper inspections separate from protocol. there has to be a proper inspection regime so that we can if we have reason o