Programs to watch out for. Sunday night, criminologist violentatzer tracks the crime in america through the 1960s. We had this demographic bulge after the war when the soldiers came home given the prosperity of the country. We had many people marrying and having children, having families. These children, the baby boomer generation, reached their most comedogenic years in the late 60s and the early 70s. Who y, he argues that while technology sometimes solves troubling social and economic problems, its not the main driver progress. What book tv all weekend every weekend on cspan2. Justice Antonin Scalia has died at the age of 79. Coming up, a q and a interview with Justice Scalia. Thats followed by a 2009. Nterview later, Justice Scalia shares his view on the First Amendment in a discussion that also included Justice Ruth Bader ginsburg. This week on q a our guest is Supreme Court associate justice antonin skull. Is called reading the law. Interpretation of legal texts. Lamb your book re
No use of legislative history. Described the opposing theories of interpretation. And most importantly i have gone through the steps that a textual list has to take. In order to produce a correct reading of the text. Namely the socalled canons of interpretation. Ancient andrgely common sense how language is used. Brian lamb whod you expect to read this. Scalia i hope judges and lawyers and law students will read it. I hope legislators will read it. Important that legislators know how their language will be interpreted by the courts as it is for the courts to know how they ought to interpret the language. Lamb im not a lawyer. Justice scalia the addition to the general public. It would give the general reader world ofinto the judges. About deciding on the meaning of enacted texts. All, most important of what is the true fault line in judges. Judges. Ishing the fall line is not conservative versus liberal. It is rather theories of interpretation which differ. Lamb im going to read long p
Which comes from being difficult to get both sides together. But were working on a corporate Integration Program that may very well put a stop to inversions that really if we could go on a bipartisan basis could make a real didnt in those problems this year. Now, were stuck right now because we have to wait until a joint tax comes up with its analysis. So far it looks good. And i hope that youll keep an open mind with regard to that because its something that i think is doable. And it would put a real crimp in the inversions that are going on in our society, the clipper inversions. And i think we would get Companies Back once we do it. We all know that the best way to solve that problem is to cut the Corporate Tax rates so that were competitive. But that is another matter that is very difficult to do under current circumstances with the problems between both of the parties here in the senate. Im looking for ways to bring people together with the administration and see if we can solve t
[inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] hello, everyone. Good afternoon. Im susan [inaudible] on behalf of our owners and our entire staff, id like to welcome you to politics prose. Just a reminder to, please, turn off or silence your cell phones. Also during our question and answer session, if you could step up to this mic right here, wed appreciate it because were recording this event. And you can leave your chairs, as we have a couple more events this afternoon. If you havent been to the store before, please, pick up one or our events calendars and take a look at all we have going on here including classes. Weve got three International Trips this fall, we have [inaudible] next month, so lots going on. Im excited to introduce steve almond and Gregg Easterbrook this afternoon to discuss two books on the remarkablytimely subject of football reform. Im not sure we could have picked a better moment to have this discussion gi
Come. And then it occurred to me, um, they all got advances, you know . So thats probably the difference. [laughter] yes, sir. The new George Washington library at mount vernon [inaudible] in accumulating these papers, would you now consider that to be a president ial library . Well, i consider it a president ial library. Its not considered an official president ial Library Simply because its not, that has to do with a designation with the national archives. That doesnt mean its any worse or better or anything like that, all right . Its not part of that federal system. But i havent been there since theyve refurbished it, but my understanding is it is an incredible library. And so that isnt pejorative in any way, that its not part of the official. I mean, if i hadnt just stuck to those 13 libraries, id still be taking this trip, and my wife would have divorced me. [laughter] so, um, now that youve finished this one, what do you think youre going to write next . [laughter] well, im not g