owners we know this operator and he s on the permit so the fact he had his stepdaughter sign the operation at the hearing fwrts d b h he wasn t an applicant and it was issued. to both mr. mendez and at that time, hearing they referred to it as a family business it was not a family business it was about a nonprofit that helped patient we re happy to answer our esquires questions if you have questions about the litigation all of the history behind it but i don t think you need to go there when he was entrusted with the permittee stole the pg&e so if you have any questions, i ll be happy to answer them okay. we can hear if the permit holder now. permit holder first then the department. the permit holder will speak first then the department thank you. good evening. i m paul, i represent the permit holder who s present. i m not going to address the points in my brief i assume the panel has read it i want to add one point there are a vantage point in the presentation this e
department now. good evening, commissioners madam chair i m on behalf of the respondent of department of health so this started with the directors hearing so that means the director of health has designated that essentially the health officer of the department to hear those permit appeal matters and that s because article 33 is in the health code this is the health issue. and the remits in article 33 are pretty state your name for the record and the majority of those concerns health issues for example, does the dispensary operate a growth on site do they intend to allow smoking within the facility do they summit american people accurate security plan those are all health related concerned that can be traced back to the state law the com pack at act you have the director that heard in this matter from both appellant here today as well as the party of interest you ve heard from the members of the public he had before him the paperwork submitted by ms. michelle who was seeking
the facility do they summit american people accurate security plan those are all health related concerned that can be traced back to the state law the com pack at act you have the director that heard in this matter from both appellant here today as well as the party of interest you ve heard from the members of the public he had before him the paperwork submitted by ms. michelle who was seeking to become the sole owner on the permit and he granted the change of ownership. this demands of commentary papers and forged signatures there s no dlagsdz before you that anything was forged the whole discussion about the suspension of the permit as a result of the fire in the discovery of load firearm back in 2007 that is indeed old history. the suspension was issued for thirty days and there were no conditions attached. during that time period appellant had a relationship with the real parties trustee he was involved. where was he when all this was going on you don t even need to ask t
good evening, commissioners madam chair i m on behalf of the respondent of department of health so this started with the directors hearing so that means the director of health has designated that essentially the health officer of the department to hear those permit appeal matters and that s because article 33 is in the health code this is the health issue. and the remits in article 33 are pretty state your name for the record and the majority of those concerns health issues for example, does the dispensary operate a growth on site do they intend to allow smoking within the facility do they summit american people accurate security plan those are all health related concerned that can be traced back to the state law the com pack at act you have the director that heard in this matter from both appellant here today as well as the party of interest you ve heard from the members of the public he had before him the paperwork submitted by ms. michelle who was seeking to become the s
article 3 it s a broader discretion today, i m going to ask you not to ward bad behavior and look at it your decision today and the message it send. i ve done a press conference for a parent that operated a cannabis on ocean street he suffered himself to federal custody for money structuring the wrecklessness from this address transcends who on paper is operating a this collective this has been one of the problematic addresses the violations extend to 2011 and are not just in 207 i want to say that they re the worst on revolved nobody has been granted a permit to consult elevate they were asked not to do this in a residential structure they committed a felon with a loaded weapon and under the pressure view of president obama s regarding the medical cannabis oversight. when we are looking the current members that are paying their cooperative paying their rent with a $48,000 security deposit to formerly disgraced supervisor east side trust that s concerning to me and there s in