they are still there for the next bad judgment? they are and there has been a lot of unbridled power in the executive branch in this administration. all the czars that were created and all the ways in which they tried to accomplish their agenda through agency regulations and things they can t get through the political process in congress. these appointments are example of that where he put people into positions went around it. this was unconstitutional power grab. it will be litigated. there will be a lot of lawsuits and challenges that are filed and many of us in congress will join in briefs in support of those lawsuits. greta: harry reid, in support why wouldn t he? you have democrats that support the bill? i would think he would. my guess is there is opposition to it because administration is
former u.n. ambassador john bolton joins us. saber rattling or we have to worry about terrorism on our soil? a few months ago administration ichb diet revolutionary guards to kill the saudi arabia ambassador in the united states. i don t think this is new. what it under lines that iran is determined to reach the successful conclusion to the quest for nuclear weapons. that remains or should remain our real focus. greta: my ni real change. i would assume they are threatening us. threats of terrorism on the u.s. soil. did it come as a huge surprise? i don t think so. they have armed terrorist in iraq and have attacked coalition forces and aiding and arming the taliban for the last ten years. they remain the world s central banker of international
it attracts good talent. he is still in the position to make other decisions. is it pretty much i know he justify saying attracting good talent. i don t consider good talent if you are failing. what about him? he served to the pleasure of the president. the president has been very silent on this. it s his reiteration secretary that made the decisions on executive pay. the president hasn t spoken up at all on this. greta: that is what i don t get. people that make the decision at solyndra. we never find out who these people are. or someone that authorizes fast and furious while you try to clean up the problem on capitol hill or whatever. the actual culprit in the federal government good judgment
current number of the debt. by the time on the record is over that number will be higher. how do we begin to pay it down? a group of freshmen group of congressmen, congressman jeff landry joins us. i have a copy of the letter you written on to speaker of the house something you want to do? yeah. i had discussion with other members of congress that recognize. a number of us had a surplus last year. so we all got together and why don t we do a press conference and show america that we are leading by example and asked the speaker to take that money and apply it to the debt. again, it s part of matching action with our rhetoric. greta: $1.4 million you want to turn back to the treasury? we want to apply it to the debt. greta: interesting thing, we
terrorism. but the main threat what ought to concentrate our attention is the nuclear weapons. the way the testimony went, it implied if we stop making noises about the nuclear weapons programs they wouldn t launch terrorist attacks here. you need to get the cart before the horse. greta: so that the iran will never get a nuclear weapon. meanwhile, there is a lot of chat ear and talk and each day goes by, i don t know how much, they are advancing? clearly iran doesn t believe it. if they thought they were going to face strict sanctions they would have taken appropriate actions. what is interesting to this testimony in response to senator of coats of indiana. he said all the existing sanctions against iran, all of them have not caused one change in its policies or programs in the nuclear weapons program. everything that has been going