On Day 10 of the hearing in a batch of petitions challenging the August 5, 2019 decision to put an end to the autonomy guaranteed to Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution, the Attorney General of India R Venkataramani and the Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta argued that the.
On Day 9 of the hearing in a batch of petitions challenging the August 5, 2019 decision to put an end to the autonomy guaranteed to Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution, the petitioners concluded their submissions, reports Gursimran Kaur Bakshi TODAY, on Day 9 of the hearings .
On Day 8 of the hearing in a batch of petitions challenging the August 5, 2019 decision to put an end to the autonomy guaranteed to Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) under Article 370 of the Constitution, advocate Dinesh Dwivedi challenged the grounds on which Article 370 is claimed to have attained a ‘.
There were no impediments in running an administration in Jammu and Kashmir which could be removed only if Article 370 was removed, argues senior advocate Dushyant Dave on Day 7 of In Re Article 370 hearings, reports Gursimran Kaur Bakshi.
Senior advocate Dr Rajeev Dhavan for the petitioner Jammu and Kashmir People’s Conference in the ongoing In Re Article 370 hearings, asserted that India’s unique and continent-like diversity necessitated arrangements of autonomy such as the one that existed in Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370.