really appreciate it. thank you lawrence. coming up, our next guest has seen every kind of motion filed in georgia court. but, she has never seen anything like what the trump lawyers filed today. former district attorney gwen keys fleming can tell us how much delay the trump lawyers might achieve with that motion. she will join us next. achieve with that motion she will join us next. she will join us next. iet, the more choices, the better. that s why america s beverage companies are working together to deliver more great tasting options with less sugar or no sugar at all. in fact, today, nearly 60% of beverages sold contain zero sugar. different sizes? check. clear calorie labels? just check. with so many options, it s easier than ever to find the balance that s right for you. more choices. less sugar. balanceus.org i gotta good feeling about this, yeah less sugar. i m with it i gotta good feeling about this yeah, so let s get it
did, especially, it just is an interesting piece of the puzzle. it is a strange piece of the puzzle. it is just a weird one, but if it spurred the investigation and was part of the reason for looking into all of the vote fraud, which is really what we did, then i am honestly really glad it exists. andrew weissmann, it does not sound like, to her, that it is a decisive piece of evidence if not the decisive piece of evidence in the case against donald trump. yeah, that is my impression as well. again, i kind of chalk that up to, it is one person. i definitely have gwen s take, which is very often when you are a prosecutor, it is useful to see witnesses in the grand jury because you get jaded, and it is nice to know how they are coming of, people that you think would be credible, do
is thinking, versus just answering or something like that. just to see the thought, he s like i wish i could say that, but i can t. it was neat. he seems like an honest guy, he is a very interesting guy. what about mark meadows, what was his demeanor when he came in? mr. meadows did not share much. did he plead the fifth, did he assert privilege? i believe he had a line that was like, all of them kind of combined into one. and we are back with wendy s funding and andrew weizmann. and gwen, your local paper the journal-constitution adds this to the evidence that we are learning from emily kohrs.
of the trump family. we are gonna show you much more of this extraordinarily important interview including what emily kohrs thought about rudy giuliani s testimony in the testimony of the white house s chief last chief of staff mark meadows and lindsey graham s testimony. and mark meadows testimony compared to his assistant cassidy hutchinson s testimony. and what emily kohrs had to say about possible perjury committed inside that gradually row. first we want to bring in our legal experts to analyze what we ve heard so far. leading off our discussion is from squeeze come in, former district attorney for dekalb county, and andrew weissmann, former chief of the criminal division of the eastern district of new york. is professor practice at nyu law school and nbc legal analyst. gwen keys fleming, what are we listening to first of all? this takes me back to the moment in the hearing about the release of this report where the judge absolutely floored me
indictments. and he along with the police chief got those that are responsible off of the streets. and, so i do agree that this is a blueprint. and how we can respond to some of these heinous acts that seem to be more common than they should be in this day and time. gwen, while i have, you i want to pay because i want to talk quickly about the georgia investigation into the former president and the 2020 election. we had fulton county da fani willis saying this week that the sessions were quote unquote, imminent and then here and did not in fact released a grand jury s report for the time being. also, our own msnbc block saying this, i want to read it for you if i can. the da s reasoning for wanting to keep the granary report secret, at least for now also suggest that she is gearing up to bring criminal charges. and i think you can tell us about this or any analysis you have on this? well, first i don t have any firsthand knowledge. i can only speak to my former position as a da.