there are some weird spacing that just doesn t look right. it has a date on it in terms of when in the future it can be declassified. that doesn t really make much sense if it was produced when they said it was produced. the big red flag for us is that the document we were given, this is part of what seemed to make it red-hot, it names an american citizen, the document we were sent which we believe to be a forgery names a specific person in the trump campaign as working with the russians on their hacking attack on the election last year. and the specific name of the trump campaign person is irrelevant. i m not sharing it now because we believe from how the nsa works from multiple conversations with current and former officials, we believe a u.s. citizen s name would never appear in a document like this. even if the typos and the weird spacing and the other odd stuff had snuck through for some reason, an american citizen s name would not have snuck through. not at this level of an ns ar
believe this is the time line. is the time line a clue as to who contacted us and sent us this document? we don t know. maybe the metadata itself is faked or wrong in some way. i don t know. there are other things that are wrong in the document too. that raised red flags for us but they re subtle. there are some little typos. some weird spacing that just doesn t look right. it has a date on it in termtss when in the future it can be declassified. that doesn t make sense if it was produced when they said it was produced. the big red flag for us is that the document we were given, this is part of what made it seem so red hot, it names an american citizen. the document we were sent, which we believe to be a forgery, names a specific person in the trump campaign as working with the russians on their hacking attack on the election last year. and the specific name of the trump campaign person is irrelevant and i m not sharing it now because we belief from how the nsa works with multiple
russian attack itself. next week on wednesday, the house intelligence committee is going to hear from jeh johnson who was homeland security secretary to the end of the obama administration. that same day the intelligence committee on the senate is going to take testimony from a bunch of experts and elections officials who are going to be talking about the russian hacking attack as they experienced it, as it targeted state and local election systems. beyond that russian hacking attack on state and local election systems, which we re learning more and more about all the time, and beyond the russian hacking attack on the democratic party and the clinton campaign, the other prong of the russian attack last year was, of course, their open source social media stuff. russia appears to have had paid operatives and automated bots using propaganda and disinformation and mounting these swarming-style attacks to disrupt the messaging of the
back to a focus on that collusion issue and on the russian attack itself. next week on wednesday, the house intelligence committee committee is going to hear from jay johnson who was homeland security secretary to the end of the obama administration. the intelligence committee on the senate is going to take testimony from a bunch of experts and elections officials who are going to be talking about the russian hacking attack as they experienced it, as it targeted state and local election systems. beyond that russian hacking attack on state and local election systems which we re learning more and more about all the time and beyond the russian hacking attack on the democratic party and the clinton campaign, the other prong of the russian attack last year was, of course, their open source social media stuff. russia appears to have had paid operatives and automated bots. to promote and circulate pro-trump, anti-clinton news and disinformation. if cnn is right in this report tonight in the i
systems. beyond that russian hacking attack on state and local election systems which we re learning more and more about all the time and beyond the russian hacking attack on the democratic party and the clinton campaign, the other prong of the russian attack last year was, of course, their open source social media stuff. russia appears to have had paid operatives and automated bots. using propaganda and dis information to disrupt the messaging of the pro-trump, anti-clinton news disinformation. if cnn is right in this report tonight in the investigating committees are now going to start questioning donald trump s digital campaign chief from his presidential campaign about that part of the russian attack, it