and cohen has suggested he knows about that. and then even potentially the hacking conspiracy, cohen is draw in. and one quick final point is the two immunities to the cfo and to david pecker are in connection with the cohen probe, but i think it s very likely that the prosecutors will have plumbed the depths of what those two men know and it figures to be quite a lot. when you say plum the depths, i don t know whether to close my eyes, close my ears or just get a sensor. let s watch alan dershowitz along the lines of what you re saying, harry. if i were trump s lawyers, i d be focusing all of my defense efforts on the southern district and let the mueller probe go. i think people who support president trump ought to hope that the businesses were conducted entirely aboveboard. or if there are minor violations, there are corporate violations, not personal violations, but the president has to be focused on this,
rationale for this investigatio investigation, he s precisely right about that, if the hacking conspiracy and there hasn t been any evidence at least that we know of that ties either the president or anyone in the trauma campaign to that. so the reason this is relevant is a prosecutor should not get to interview the president. this would be an easy one if they were trying to interview a journalist. he would say there needs to be a serious crime and there needs to be some showing that the journalist is the only repositories, the only source of the information that the prosecutor has available. can t get it from anywhere else. you don t just get to interview the president because you think it would be interesting. you have to show sandra: they are leaving the president and his legal team hanging here, as peter doocy just reported. does this happen or not? i don t think i ve never thought it should happen but as i said at the beginning, i can understand both sides because if i wer