Page 9 - Hand Knowledge News Today

Very fast track. whats going on? >> neil, good afternoon. nancy pelosi critical of those that helped inform the whistle-blower. >> for the president to say what he said about those that may have supplied information to the whistle-blower, seriously undermines integrity in government. the president does that almost every day. >> republicans continue questioning the information in that whistle-blower complaint. >> well, theres no way of knowing what is real and what is not. its second or third inf...

Account not only do we have to get to the facts, but the american people have to perceive that this is fair process. >> reporter: lawmakers are leaving town for two weeks, but adam schiff told fox news it will be a difficult couple of weeks. lawmakers are expected to seek testimony from attorney general william barr, president trumps person attorney, rudy giuliani and other officials. there are also discussions about having a whistleblower up here to testify with some republicans raising questio...

Steve: yeah, but the whistleblower. >> so secretive and such cover-up here is the documents. this is nuts. this is nonsense. steve: the whistleblower said they put it in the super code word protected computers that they hardly ever put things in. >> well, the whistleblower or what -- i dont even like calling this individual a whistleblower, this individual that decided to spy on the presidents conversation based on here say information thats a better way of saying it. but, whatever you want to d...

Were leaked. the white house implemented new protocols to store leader calls. president trump continued his campaign today to shred the whistleblowers credibility tweeting: sounding more and more like the so-called whistleblower isnt a whistleblower at all. the president pointed to inaccuracies in the complaint, including the claim that state department official all rec was on the call. is a senior administration official tells fox news he wasnt. according to the "new york times," ukraines presi...

Certainly no first hand knowledge. now the democrats are going to move ahead with impeachment after reading that transcript? its ridiculous. what schiff did with his opening statement is ridiculous as well. >> some lawmakers say theres pressure to get moving on this with next year being a presidential election year, shep. >> shepard: what about other agenda items even the possibility of some of them getting done? >> new york congress woman alexandria ocasio-cortez says before this, theres not mu...

>> juan: everything he has said has been backed up. >> jesse: not true. >> juan: idea interfering for the foreign country for the 2020 election. >> jesse: isnt that what obama and hillary did, juan? >> greg: did trump ask for the servers back? >> juan: this is the gateway, isnt it because they were afraid of joe biden. they want to demonize joe biden just like that was the game plan to go after hillary clinton. >> katie: they are afraid that joe biden is going to taken out and trump is going to ...

Specifically the law protects people with first hand knowledge. when you look at the complaint, there are multiple references to a number of white house officials who told me x. well, if that is the case and if it is so egregious that it requires executive privilege to be waived and for the inspector general and the fbi to get involved, those white house officials have the protections to present this information firsthand. and the other big thing is that was detailed today by the acting dni chie...

Organized crime. this is the same adam schiff that spent two years saying he had evidence, not allegations, evidence of collusion between the president and russia. that didnt out to be true. how do you build an impeachment on this supposition? >> dana: why did they move forward with nancy pelosis dramatic announcement at 5:00 p.m. yesterday before having read the transcript of a call -- >> thats what is shocking. kim strossel tweeted that the democrats moved forward on impeachment based on a whi...

National intelligence said the reason they didnt give the complaint to congress was because it was about a person who was outside of the intelligence community. and that the inspector general deals with people who work for the intelligence community. but there is also here on page 6 beginning at the paragraph that says the complainant describes a here say report. so this whole thing began with third hand knowledge. now we have the transcript out so were filling in a lot of the blanks. >> sandra:...

Me at this point is why wasnt the inspector general in the intelligence community deciding to ring the bell on this complain when they did not have access to the transcript and the whistle-blower did not have first hand knowledge of the phone call? you know these i.g.s get hundreds of complaints from individuals who have documents or have first-hand knowledge of what they allege to be corrupt activity. so what was it that made the icig ring the bell and escalate this matter so its gotten to the ...