that s the very first thing that i think of when someone comes up to me and threatens me with my daughter. anyone who has a daughter knows you go right to the police. it s complete nonsense. she says she didn t go to the police because she was scared and she walked into the room and to the notion that he s saying it s defamatory? file a lawsuit. look, the majority you got the letter yesterday. wait a minute. last time you didn t let me talk. this time you are going to let me talk. i let you otherwise, we re going to have to get the defibrillator. please go for it. i almost brought it today. look, the american people saw last night something that they haven t seen from michael cohen. they actually saw my client answer questions by a world-renowned journalist who asked tough questions. she sat in an interview for two hours or thereabouts, and she faces the tough questions and she answered them. and the american people saw
more recent intimidations, the threats to be silent and possible threat years ago is where he is going to face legal trouble. for the life of me, but i can t figure out why turn and his team are denying it so much. it was sort of the common knowledge. this is a president who has secrets, many secrets that were not aired out through the election and that he still wants to keep and given the system that was in place to get this done so quickly, so fast by the president s closest allies and michael cohen and national enquirer, you have to believe there are more to come. the republicans, it s very convenient first off. the greater issue here is most people who get a security clearance in the federal government, if they have a vulnerable that places them in a compromised position where they could be blackmailed if the exposure of a secret is not there, like, i don t know, a
arbitrator, and i think that s going to be a very important motion. i m not say i know how that motion will be resolved, but i think the issue of whether this is resolved in a courtroom or in front of an arbitrator is a very important one, and i think that s going to be the way because of the discovery? well, exactly. or because of because it s a way of pushing the case into secret. arbitration procedures are mostly secret. michael says under certain circumstances you can get discovery. that s news to me, but you may be right. but i just think the initial legal argument in front of the federal court is going to be about arbitration, and i think it s going to be an important one. i don t pretend to know how that will be resolved. i m still looking for an answer about the lie detector test. what happened to the lie detector test? you paid for it, and you held it up here. now you re admitting it s not good.
decision early on they don t want to do anything to help this administration. i think that s been discounted. it s not so much oh, we don t have a client who won t listen to us or we re afraid of what clients won t do. it s people who are saying we don t want to help this president. sure. got to believe in your client if your ideology is not in doesn t jive, it wouldn t work. stormy daniels attorney, attorney for michael cohen. in an unrelated matter sparred right here on cnn about this legal battle of this alleged affair which, again, the white house is denying. watch this. it s very simple. my client sat down. she answered the questions. 90% of america found her credible. why hasn t michael cohen sat down, forget two hours.
brought in michael cohen individually. previously it was the limited liability company that he set up. strictly to facilitate the payment. we have named michael cohen individually as it relates to what we allege are defamatory statements that he made. namely, he made statements earlier this year whereby he basically said that the affair never happened in some so many words and made my client out to be a liar. we are going to test the voracity of his statements. against those of my client. you played the interview of my client over the last 45 minutes or so. and we think 90% of america if not more found her very, very credible. and michael cohen has a lot of explaining to do relating to his statements to the american people. as part of the amendment, you are asking for monetary damages. all along i thought you said this wasn t about money, this was about invalidating this nda. i think we are going to be able to show there has been