About a fascinating book. It was a fasting book about a fascinating case, National Federation of independent business is versus sebelius, better known as the obamacare case. As i read this book i thought that i was really watching some very, very smart people who obviously respect each other but youre in no way, shape, or form shy about challenging each other, and they would advance and refine their arguments as the book progressed covering many facets of the obamacare case, some of which they will discuss today. I will introduce all of the speakers anywhere in which they will speak it will start off with trevor burrus. Trevor was the editor of a conspiracy against obamacare. He is a Research Fellow at the Cato Institute center for conscious constitutional studies where his interests include constitutional law, civil and criminal law, legal and political philosophy and legal history. Trevor got his undergraduate degree at university of colorado at boulder and his law degree at the univ
Ive seen pros stents and catholics who swore never, never shake hands, and ive seen a man walk out of a prison cell thats held him for 28 years to become elected president of a majority ruled and free south africa. Ive seen the Carolina Panthers win eight games in a row and go perfect in the nfc south division, so dont tell me its impossible. Its just hard. Thank you very much. Its been a pleasure talking with you today. [laughter] [applause] great stuff, joe, spectacular. As youre thinking of questions, we have a boom mic in the back to bring around to anyone with questions. We will not leave here until we get questions from a student or two, so get them cued up. Im mike holly, board member of the World Affairs council, and as you prepare to ask questions, i have to say one ning, and that is, if youre in the a member of the World Affairs council, we need now to be. Thats true of everyone in the room, but also true for those of us watching on cspan, sign up on our website. Well be glad
Liberty a minute. Repo book and join the conversation, go to booktv. Org and click on book club to enter the chat room. Next on booktv from the Heritage Foundation in washington, d. C. , a discussion on the legal arguments against the Affordable Care act. Trevor burrus, editor of the book and a panel, all law professors and bloggers for the volokh conspiracy website, talk about the impact of the arguments on the obama to debate, both in public and in the courts. This is about an hour 15. Thank you much for being here, and i applaud you hardy souls who braved the cold weather today in order to be here. We are here today with several distinct which panelists to talk about a fascinating book. It was a fascinating about a fascinating case of National Federation of independent business is versus sebelius, better known as the obamacare case. And as i read this book, i thought that i was really watching some very, very smart people who obviously respect each other but who are in no way, shape
Secret meeting, and it was quite extraordinary, and it formed a lifetime bond for the two of them. So once again, sally sort of pushed the envelope a little bit and figured i can bend the rules as long as no one gets hurt. In fact, no one knew this story fully until ive told anytime the book. So state department only now is finding out about it. [laughter] other questions . No questions. Everyone wants to get their books signed. Okay, well, thats great. Thank you all for coming. [applause] the books are up behind the cash register. You can come back here and get them signed. [inaudible conversations] youre watching booktv on cspan2. Heres our prime time lineup for tonight. Up next, books on the Supreme Court. Then at 7 30, a panel from the leavitt forum on thomas left forum on thomas partnerships common sense. On after words, jason reilly talks about his book, please stop helping us, with april ryan of the american urban radio network. At 10 is p. M. Eastern, kai bird, and we wrap up t
Be, this project will be blocked because it interferes with my view, or things like that. Sometimes people would show up and they would say this is destructive of the culture of the neighborhood, for a variety of reasons. And you have to, i believe, review the input but also believe its not necessarily last source of wisdom. So you need it and thats one of the reasons the Environmental Review is a great because its so destructive because it gets facts on the table, allows the debate to happen. But the community shouldnt make the final decision because then the common good gets killed. Someone has to be looking at both the views of interest and, good to make the final decision. Youre talking about someone who represents the community would still have the guts, is that what youre talking about . In the case of new york city, lets say the mayor, so not just the community. If you have team unitybased decisionmaking solely, many of the articles of confederation and nothing ever happens. I t