law? i m going to tell you you re out of your mind! that never would have happened 50, 60 years ago in the democratic party. lyndon johnson would have voted against this? no way on earth! what has happened to that party? but the democratic party of today is a very different democratic party than when you had john kennedy, who believed in a very strong america and a visionary america. it s a very different, even from the democrats you had the southern bluedog democrats. they re all zone. every one of them have been voted out because there is no room in the democratic party for anyone other than a far left wing liberal. that s the only places that are left in the party. it s just amazing their constituencies still continue like tip o neill. that s a very good example. tip o neill s going to vote against kate s law? no, he s not. he wouldn t have. it s ridiculous! it s absurd. yet, they re all like lemmings. they just follow the pelosi/reid/clarion call to just, they don t car
law? i m going to tell you you re out of your mind! that never would have happened 50, 60 years ago in the party. lyndon johnson would have voted against this? no way on earth! what has happened to that party? but the democratic party of today is a very different democratic party than when you had john kennedy, who believed in a very strong america and a visionary america. it s a very different, even from the democrats you had the southern bluedog democrats. they re all zone. every one of them have been voted out because there is no room in the democratic party for anyone other than a far left wing liberal. that s the only places that are left in the party. it s just amazing their constituencies still continue like tip o neill. that s a very good example. tip o neill s going to vote against kate s law? no, he s not. he wouldn t have. it s ridiculous! it s absurd. yet, they re all like lemmings. they just follow the pelosi/reid/clarion call to just, they don t care! and they
would have voted against kate s law? i m going to tell you you re out of your mind! that never would have happened 50, 60 years ago in the democratic party. lyndon johnson would have voted against this? no way on earth! what has happened to that party? but the democratic party of today is a very different democratic party than when you had john kennedy, who believed in a very strong america and a visionary america. it s a very different, even from the democrats you had the southern bluedog democrats. they re all zone. every one of them have been voted out because there is no room in the democratic party for anyone other than a far left wing liberal. that s the only places that are left in the party. it s just amazing their constituencies still continue like tip o neill. that s a very good example. tip o neill s going to vote against kate s law? no, he s not. he wouldn t have. it s ridiculous! it s absurd. yet, they re all like lemmings. they just follow the pelo just, they
would have voted against kate s law? i m going to tell you you re out of your mind! that never would have happened 50, 60 years ago in the democratic party. lyndon johnson would have voted against this? no way on earth! what has happened to that party? but the democratic party of today is a very different democratic party than when you had john kennedy, who believed in a very strong america and a visionary america. it s a very different, even from the democrats you had the southern bluedog democrats. they re all zone. every one of them have been voted out because there is no room in the democratic party for anyone other than a far left wing liberal. that s the only places that are left in the party. it s just amazing their constituencies still continue like tip o neill. that s a very good example. tip o neill s going to vote against kate s law? no, he s not. he wouldn t have. it s ridiculous! it s absurd. yet, they re all like lemmings. they just follow the pelosi/reid/clar
how does he really knock it out of the park wednesday night? i m not backing off the debate. i watch the debates in a vacuum. so if you don t know anything about donald trump before the debate, you watch that debate, he wouldn t have had 5%. he was that bad. tell me why, be specific. first off, he was sort of anti-woman in the debate. he also came off very petty and sort of mean. when he didn t like the questions, he attacks the questioner. donald trump is a billionaire. yet he couldn t give specifics on how he would help the economy when asked about bankruptcies he had nothing to say except those were mean people i took the money from. but how much is this this about specifics and policy versus personality and for some of these folks really introducing themselves to the millions who are watching?