it gives them additional choices. that s what the republican party should stand for. the idea that people who like obamacare, fine, but what is important is that people have more liberty, more choice to go ahead and devise their own health insurance and to get the kind of health insurance and negotiate for the kind of health insurance that they want. less government compulsion, more individual choice. but you tell me whether or not you support or oppose this, i am curious, because a lot of conservative media, breitbart seems pretty opposed to this right now, freedomworks, heritage out against it, the koch brothers don t seem to like it one bit. what you re hearing from people calling in, are you hearing support or opposition to this as it stands right now? i would say overwhelming opposition. i spent three hours only on this issue yesterday. and i would say probably 75% of the people that got through on the phone to the show said they did not like it. now, the big question i asked
but there are various societal effects. heritage out today with a thing claiming that gay marriage will increase the abortion rate by making marriage less appealing and therefore people won t get married and married people will get more abortions. it s crazy, but there is this argument about how it s not about the individual, it s about society-wide effects. so you can say yes, there are real gay people and it s not a choice, but for the good of society, they re not supposed to get married. chris i have to think that there is quiet finger crossing and whatever ceremonies republicans engage in ahead of supreme court decisions, a lot of those hoping that the supreme court takes this off the table. yeah. because that s really the only way to neutralize it. there s still going to be people in the party certainly. ted cruz is going to be opposed to it no matter what the supreme court says and he s going to talk about it. at the same time it allows the jeb bush part of the party i