transmission to air traffic control. and at that point, the transponders went off and that suggests hijacking. that is a key point, and scott brenner, who is a former faa official, who was at the faa on 9/11, broke that news here. we questioned it that very night, mike, because they were saying look, the transponder tracks the plane and it doesn t match up. the ascertainable assertion doesn t line up. we don t know it for sure. what we do know is that a destination that was west and not on the plane s original journey was programmed in prior to when they signed off from air traffic control. but i m not sure what we can glean from that. well, we do know that they did not put 7700 into the transponder, which was emergency code, or the hijack code.
transmission to air traffic control. and at that point, the transponders went off and that suggests hijacking. that is a key point, and scott brenner, who is a former faa official, who was at the faa on 9/11, broke that news here. we questioned it that very night, mike, because they were saying look, the transponder tracks the plane and it doesn t match up. the ascertainable assertion doesn t line up. we don t know it for sure. what we do know is that a destination that was west and not on the plane s original journey was programmed in prior to when they signed off from air traffic control. but i m not sure what we can glean from that. well, we do know that they did not put 7700 into the transponder, which was emergency code, or the hijack code. they put nothing in there except