more information we don t know. let s talk about what he said. les abend. when you hear this from the u.s. defense secretary, not ruling out terrorism here, almost to week three, what is your reaction to that. my reaction, that s a smart statement. i am not ruling out anything, i m not stuck to a particular theory. i know i have written an article with regards to the scenario of fire and smoke, but there are holes in that theory, as there is in a hijacking theory also. okay. let me run through a couple questions we have been getting from viewers, and combing the twitter. here is one from a number of viewers, wondering what are the lanc chances the plane could be intact somewhere in the ocean? highly improbable, highly improbable, even if the airplane
hijacking theory. why is that dangerous in this investigation? i think if we start lining up, and i see this in my blog or e-mail peal saying the plane was hijacked or it was mechanical failure. i am coming to the point where i believe the airplane could have gone down for both. it could have been hijacked and perhaps it turns into a flight 93 where the people in the back took control of the airplane. or a system or mechamechanical failure. the defense minister in kuala
within boeing is claiming that the company, boeing, which made the jet, also believes this airplane is in pakistan right now. as we first reported here last night the jet changed course shortly after takeoff, adding fuel to the hijacking theory. in other words, they had made the change, had programmed it in at least prior to signing off from air traffic control without mentioning that. general tom mcinerney is a retired air force pilot and a fox news contributor. general, good to see you. so as i understand it a source within boeing reportedly told this group, lignet, a retired bunch of cia types, boeing came out today after you talked about that on fox news yesterday and said we don t have information. i want to get the denial, the boeing company does not have information that substantiates your claims. your thoughts?
over 630 different potential landing sites that were established in this search radius because of the size of the 777 it would need 7,000 to land and an experienced pilot could do it less than that, about 5,000 feet but if it was landing be used for takeoff it needs that longer length. when you look at the hijacking theory there seems no reason why a hijacker would turn off the transponder and all sorts of abilities to track the plane and then just ditch it where no one can see. unless went wrong. that s why something else happened. something else happened. something else happened. very fascinating think about the poseidon. this sophisticated aircraft that the u.s. navy has lent to the search. i want to talk about that so our audience understands this is built from an air frame of 737 and fly maximum speed 565 miles an hour. as the navy tells us the poseidon in this search fly