His Process News Today

Them not to appear and there were many documents that were not presented, particularly in ambassador sondlands testimony. he clearly said he was not able to access e-mails. >> yeah. >> so the secretary is creating a distraction. i think this is going to be a time of ones faith, a time of ones love for their country, a time of patriotism, and a time of respect for the dignity and the constitution and democracy. there will be disagreement. i know that, but the facts are undisputed. our friends on ...

She will be put to the test. and thats the right thing to do. to judge the credibility and thank you for the opportunity. >> let me make one last point. im willing to make her available. for eight hours of cross-examination. under oath. if in turn she will make her client brett kavanaugh available for eight hours of cross-examination by me. im to it tomorrow. >> right and they will not. they have one set of questioners theyll deal with tomorrow. michael avenatti. this is relevant information. i ...

And said this. >> is this is everything to do with our country. when you are guilty, until proven innocent, its just not supposed to be that way. always i heard youre innocent until proven guilty. i have heard this for so long. its a beautiful phrase. in this case, youre guilty until proven innocent. i think that is a very dangerous standard for our country. >> its also dangerously false. if we know nothing else from the process and the rush to judgment, theyre doing what they can to help insula...

Standard. so this is going to be about how he dealt with the past in the present. if he is judged to be someone who would lie about partying in high school, can he be trusted to be truthful and impartial about the president and major issues of consequence? everyones so focused on whats true and not and why i believe her and why i believe him. you dont know anything. lets be honest. thats not what this process has been about. this is more about credibility than it is about proof. its not a trial....

As her attacker thats what im saying. im asking you what do you think she could say if she were given the chance that should mean the most to senators? >> chris, she actually does say she witnessed kavanaugh conduct himself inappropriately. and verbally and physically abuse women. in a sexual manner. i think thats early on in the declaration. its right there in the black and white. let me say this. >> this is at home. >> thank you. this is a detailed statement it is a sworn statement under penal...

To take interviews with all the witnesses. including mark judge. and brett kavanaugh. perhaps we can test his claims the other night on fox news. about being such an innocent high schooler. where he would walk little old ladies across the street and bring an apple to every teacher. we want a search for the truth. a legit search for the truth. >> lets start with process. you are calling on the fbi to continue the background. you could see her to the fbi. to launch a complaint. go to local authori...

State of maryland. we may do that. we may plead out a criminal complaint. lets be clear, even if we were to do that today, or last week, or over the weekend, that wouldnt change or have any impact formally on the judicial nominee process. before this senate judiciary committee. >> all right. next question about this just in terps of look ago at it out wardly. and well get into the credibility. this is what the process demands for fairness. what do you believe a that your client can demonstrate t...

Very capable men and women of the fbi to solve. and yet for some reason graham and the chairman of the senate judiciary committee. donald trump. and others. mcconnell. do not want to trust the fbi with getting to the bottom of the allegations. >> although to be fair to the process, chuck grassly is made that point. thats the name you were looking for. they are not in the business of proving or disproving the allegations or really assessing the credibility. what they could do and what i have been...

Tomorrow. >> ill give you the final point on this. thats all i argued all week. is process. i dont know anything about judge kavanaugh except what i have picked up from reporting and accounts of himself. and the allegations. i dont know why they didnt take the time to give him the clearance that he obviously wants. and say look, we have the fbi do what they do. they wont give us a conclusion. they wont assess veracity. this isnt a criminal investigation. heres what everybody says. its all in one...

And if its all true, fine. if you take the three named accusers at the absolute minimum value, okay, what do we know? someone was not in church all the time. someone was seen drunk a lot for a guy who denies any excess and may have been present for far worse than just drinking. it does not make him a rapist. dont say it does. its not fair to the process. but these accounts, if true in any way, a minimum standard, they mean something you may hear a lot about tomorrow. brett kavanaugh was not tell...