Other policy issues, she patiently explained that none of that is her job. I interpret the constitution as a law, and its not up to me to update it or infuse my own policy views into it. As ive also said repeatedly, any policy preferences that i have dont matter anyway. Theyre irrelevant. So making that law, thats sure job. Gerry what we saw on display were the two very different visions of the role of the courts. Conservatives believe in judicial restraint the, interpretation of the law by judges. Democrats want to use the judiciary to make policy. Its why they object to judge barrett and why they plan to pack the court if they win the white house and senate next month. Democrats dont really want to talk about this, so of course what they do is attacked judge barrett on a range of other, frankly, completely extraneous things. The most bizarre was the condemnation this week of her for using a particular word when she was talking about sexuality. I have no i agenda, and i do want to be
Wade, gun control and a host of other policy issues, she patiently explained that none of that is her job. I interpret the constitution as a law, and its not up to me to update it or infuse my own policy views into it. As ive also said repeatedly, any policy preferences that i have dont matter anyway. Theyre irrelevant. So making that law, thats sure job. Gerry what we saw on display were the two very different visions of the role of the courts. Conservatives believe in judicial restraint the, interpretation of the law by judges. Democrats want to use the judiciary to make policy. Its why they object to judge barrett and why they plan to pack the court if they win the white house and senate next month. Democrats dont really want to talk about this, so of course what they do is attacked judge barrett on a range of other, frankly, completely extraneous things. The most bizarre was the condemnation this week of her for using a particular word when she was talking about sexuality. I have n
Other policy issues, she patiently explained that none of that is her job. I interpret the constitution as a law, and its not up to me to update it or infuse my own policy views into it. As ive also said repeatedly, any policy preferences that i have dont matter anyway. Theyre irrelevant. So making that law, thats sure job. Gerry what we saw on display were the two very different visions of the role of the courts. Conservatives believe in judicial restraint the, interpretation of the law by judges. Democrats want to use the judiciary to make policy. Its why they object to judge barrett and why they plan to pack the court if they win the white house and senate next month. Democrats dont really want to talk about this, so of course what they do is attacked judge barrett on a range of other, frankly, completely extraneous things. The most bizarre was the condemnation this week of her for using a particular word when she was talking about sexuality. I have no i agenda, and i do want to be
Wade, gun control and a host of other policy issues, she patiently explained that none of that is her job. I interpret the constitution as a law, and its not up to me to update it or infuse my own policy views into it. As ive also said repeatedly, any policy preferences that i have dont matter anyway. Theyre irrelevant. So making that law, thats sure job. Gerry what we saw on display were the two very different visions of the role of the courts. Conservatives believe in judicial restraint the, interpretation of the law by judges. Democrats want to use the judiciary to make policy. Its why they object to judge barrett and why they plan to pack the court if they win the white house and senate next month. Democrats dont really want to talk about this, so of course what they do is attacked judge barrett on a range of other, frankly, completely extraneous things. The most bizarre was the condemnation this week of her for using a particular word when she was talking about sexuality. I have n
Wade, gun control and a host of other policy issues, she patiently explained that none of that is her job. I interpret the constitution as a law, and its not up to me to update it or infuse my own policy views into it. As ive also said repeatedly, any policy preferences that i have dont matter anyway. Theyre irrelevant. So making that law, thats sure job. Gerry what we saw on display were the two very different visions of the role of the courts. Conservatives believe in judicial restraint the, interpretation of the law by judges. Democrats want to use the judiciary to make policy. Its why they object to judge barrett and why they plan to pack the court if they win the white house and senate next month. Democrats dont really want to talk about this, so of course what they do is attacked judge barrett on a range of other, frankly, completely extraneous things. The most bizarre was the condemnation this week of her for using a particular word when she was talking about sexuality. I have n