honesty: Live & Latest News Updates : Vimarsana.com
an opening. they will do one in this case, i've never seen a defense attorney miss an opportunity of doing an opening because they don't have to prove anything. i'll be interested to see what they do. they just keep it very simple because they want to wait to hear the witnesses and see the documents? i'm interested in what the defense is going to say on their opening. >> catherine, do you think trump will testify? if he does, what kind of questions should he expect? >> i don't think he will. first of all, most defendants don't. it is not like if he doesn't, it's a surprise that he didn't. he can expect, well, first of all, we will find out monday what prior bad acts he has, including his civil judgments that judge merchan will allow the prosecutors to question him about. it might be, and judge merchan needs to be careful. he has to be careful to not be prejudicial. it is a balancing act. you can't question the defendant to show they did it before, therefore they will do it again. it is about showing lack of credibility, lack of honesty. the judgments due to defamation, making false
talk about the thinking come the sort of everyday feel of the campaign. you have the big issues like abortion and big issues like ukraine. at the end of the day, this will boil down to how people feel around the kitchen table about joe biden. >> i think the world views on the way people are brought up shape who they are. president biden, because of where he comes from in scranton is guided by family, honesty, decency and hard work and that is what he brings to his leadership style. when you talk about these issues, this is the difference we will continue to point out. donald trump sees the world through country club set mar-a- lago and biden sees it from the kitchen table and communities like scranton across the country who are worried about cost and jobs and doing everything he can to make sure they have a fair shot and donald trump is out there on the economic issues promising tax breaks, three too million dollars per billion or. sitting behind closed doors of
in a statement, the party did suggest that perhaps the mp had broken some of the principles of public life, such as openness, integrity, honesty. they also suggested that some of the people who managed these non—official party accounts would need some retraining and how that should be done. and there should be a whistleblowing hotline for anyone who wants to report the misuse of funds. they've also said that should the police decide to carry out an investigation into these apparently bizarre events, then they would share any information they had with the police. and just how damaging could this be for rishi sunak? it is an election year. well, i think it's embarrassing for rishi sunak that he's got another conservative mp who's now having to sit as an independent mp until the next general election. he'll bejoining some of his colleagues. in that respect, he's also deciding that he will stand down at a general election later this year, but not resign with immediate effect. so equally, although it's embarrassing for rishi sunak,
that he disputed those claims. nonetheless, the conservative party was carrying out an investigation into the narrow question of whether funds had been misused, and we got the conclusion of that investigation today. the conclusion is that funds weren't misuse, but it would appear that there is a reason for that, because the funds where people had donated money to the party were not held in an official conservative party accounts, they were held in a thing called the westminster fylde group. that is not a conservative party account, it is not the local fylde conservative association. and for that reason, you couldn't see the conservative party funds had been misused. in addition to that, the party did suggest that perhaps the party did suggest that perhaps the mp had broken some of the principles of a public life, such as openness, integrity, honesty. they also suggested that some of the
had been misused. however, in addition to that, in a statement, the party did suggest that perhaps the mp had broken some of the principles of public life, such as openness, integrity, honesty. they also suggested that some of the people who managed these non—official party accounts would need some retraining and how that should be done. and there should be a whistle—blowing hotline for anyone who wants to report the misuse of funds. they've also said that should the police decide to carry out an investigation into these apparently bizarre events, then they would share any information they had with the police. staying in the uk, the commissioner of the metropolitan police, sir mark rowley, is to meetjewish groups on monday, after criticism over the way one of his officers treated a man during a pro—palestinian march in london. gideon falter was told he might provoke a reaction from the demonstrators because he was �*openlyjewish.’
and we got the conclusion of that investigation today. the conclusion is that funds weren't misused, but it appeared that there is a reason for that because the funds where people donated money to the party were not held in an official conservative party account, they were held in a thing called the westminster fylde group. that is not a conservative party account, it's not the local fylde conservative association. and therefore, for that reason you couldn't say that conservative party funds had been misused. however, in addition to that, in a statement, the party did suggest that perhaps the mp had broken some of the principles of public life, such as openness, integrity, honesty. they also suggested that some of the people who managed these non—official party accounts would need some retraining and how that should be done. and there should be a whistle—blowing hotline for anyone who wants to report the misuse of funds.
of public life, such as openness, integrity, honesty. they also suggested that some of the people who managed these non—official party accounts would need some retraining and how that should be done. and there should be a whistle—blowing hotline for anyone who wants to report the misuse of funds. they've also said that should the police decide to carry out an investigation into these apparently bizarre events, then they would share any information they had with the police. the uk prime minister's office says rishi sunak is appalled by the way the metropolitan police treated ajewish man, during a pro—palestinian march in london last weekend. an officer told gideon falter, he might provoke a reaction from the demonstrators, because he was �*openlyjewish'. there have been calls for the met police commissioner, mark rowley, to resign. he is due to meet the london mayor tomorrow and the home secretary during the week to discuss the incident.well the met police has
criminal defendant deserves to have a juror who's very, very nervous about the weight, awesome power of what their job is so in some ways, i think it's good that we had this kind of honesty. these people recognizing that they might not be up to it, and helping form a jury of people who hopefully are able to deal with that. as a former federal prosecutor, laura, when you see that what do you see & do you think that this is something that could potentially way on the jury as they are actually deliberating this in a way that that could jeopardize the case. that's a great point. uncertainty is what i think every one who believes in a jack assist system wants a juror to feel when they go into a courtroom because you don't want the deck totally stacked against the defendant presumption of innocence requires people to lower in fat corbyn. thank you've got approved the case to me. i'm uncertain whether the prosecution can carry their burden of proof. what you don't want is the uncertainty that jurors might be feeling of
we have a u.s. hostage enterprise with dedicated government officials that brought home more than 100 u.s. nationals. people that were targeted like jim, free of committing any crime at all but were targeted because they were americans. and more than 100 have been brought home. it is still a huge national security threat in all honesty. it is a challenge to us. americans are targeted when we travel internationally. we truly are. >> the book is titled "american mother" and it is available now. diane foley, thank you very much for writing this book and for coming on the show. you can find more information by clicking on james foley foundation. again, thank you so much. coming up, a new poll of
witnesses and see the documents, so i'm actually interested in what the defense is going to say on their opening. opening. >> catherine, do you think that trump will testify, and if he does, what kind of questions should he expect? >> i don't think he will. first of all, most defendants don't. it is not like if he doesn't it is a surprise that he didn't. so he can expect, first of all, we will find out monday what prior bad acts that he has, including his civil judgments about the judge will allow the prosecutors to question him about. and it might be, and the judge has to be very careful, he has to be careful to not be prejudicial. it is a balancing act. you cannot question the defendant to show that they did it before and there for they did it again. it is about showing lack of credibility, lack of honesty, and so the judgments that go towards defamation, making false statements with reckless disregard to the truth, or two