try to deconstruct our election process and it s absolutely disgraceful and incredibly hypocrite cal. it is. it s an attempt to seize power knowing that it s going to be minority rule. knowing you do not have the support of the majority because you can t appeal to them pause your policies are so out right white nationalists because people of color, the asian american community used to be a swing vote. it ain t no more because they have shown themselves to be so white nationalist leaning that people are no thank no matter what even if the non-white groups are you saying the china virus didn t catch on? i m afraid to show the polls. it is going toward keeping gavin newsom in. should we be looking at the california election as some sort of bellwether for democrats going into 2022 or is this a generous situation? it s a really good question.
face. the opening facial reaction also speaks volumes. i guess it s fine to point out hypocrisy. people are used to it. at times republicans in texas are making pro-choice argument against the vaccine. liberty, your body. it don t seem to apply to women. yeah. the whole vaccine thing at the moment is so hypocrite cal. there s small number of people that really do seem to believe in vaccines for a very long time and have concerns about it. they are worried about what the long term impact is. then, there are a whole bunch of people and it feels like to me you re pointing this out in texas with governor abbot who are just using this. they will use this for political gain. it has nothing to do with
legally, is there any repercussion against that? unfortunately, hypocrisy is not a constitutional violation. perhaps it should be. texas requires school age children to receive seven different vaccinations already. we re not opposed to vaccinations, just covid. i think it drives home this isn t about personal responsibility at all. it s a particular, partisan agenda. the supreme court may be sympathetic to that agenda. erica mentioned the mississippi case that the the court is set to hear later there term. what s disconcerting and eye opening is it allowed the law to go into effect. there s been no law there restrictive allowed to go into effect since roe in face of what is a transparent hypocrite cal agenda on the part of the texas legislature here. we really appreciate your
this should be behind closed doors. i think trump will decide that they should not it will be completely hypocrite cal. but i think the move is to not lend any kreendens. it should look like a partsan affair. you ll see it change. everyone will forget what we heard last week. there will be a new message this week. as we move forward in these hearings, of course we re comparing them to the nixon and clinton impeachment hearings. you wrote a piece for cnn.com about trump s prospects in 2020 after possible impeachment. and you looked back at those two examples. what did you find? obviously the public reaction to those two impeachments were different. in nixon s support grew and crossed 50% only in the last poll. in client s case impeachment
as a person, you got a problem. you need to do some self-evaluation because what s not to like? he s the nicest person i think i ve met in politics. he s as good a man as god ever created. as good a plan as god ever created. now in a very obviously rankly hypocrite cal move to try to protect donald trump and distract and give any whiff of legitimacy to the inept, corrupt plot at the heart of impeachment probe graham appears to be buddying up with giuliani going after a biden smear. this is another instance of graham reversing himself on the issues that he used to claim wasn t about party, it was about principle. that s true on the grave matter on his history of impeachment. members of the senate have said i understand everything there is about this case and i won t vote to impeach the president. please allow the facts to do the