Page 32 - Ig Report News Today

Us to do so. mr. giuliani was expressing the desires of the president of the united states. and we knew these investigations were important to the president. >> and the presidents suggestion that giuliani may have been working for other clients is contradicted by giuliani himself, who said this in a new york times report earlier this year about ukraine. my only client -- only client -- is the president of the united states. hes the one i have an obligation to report to. lets kick things off with...

Could -- i think spying did occur, yes, i think spying did occur. >> katie fast forward to two weeks ago, we see waiting for the president to depart from the white house a kind of animated discussion going on in the oval office, including that man, the guy you cover on a daily basis, the attorney general, whags the chan -- whats the chance, thinking out loud, the ag gave his brother an early look at the ig report, its not going find its spying. >> im not going inside bill barrs head. >> i tried....

Were important to the president. >> and the presidents suggestion that giuliani may have been working for other clients is contradicted by giuliani himself, who said this in a new york times report earlier this year about ukraine. my only client -- only client -- is the president of the united states. hes the one i have an obligation to report to. lets kick things off with nbc news justice correspondent pete williams. pete, this ig report has found that, i guess, the fbi did not spy on the trump...

Donald trump, the country goes back to that kind of a republican party. i think hes wrong. i think the country is changed. we are sick of the forever wars end that trump has tapped into something. is john bolton going to be a spoiler? is he going to be who brings down donald trump. i dont think theres anything to bring him down over her. and i dont think john bolton wants to end his career as someone who spoils things. he is someone who has a lot to say. i dont agree with him on a lot of things ...

President and his team could pull forward in the case that this does go to trial. she questions that. saying that the case has been so clearly made you wonder what exactly the senate will be left doing how will they hold a lengthy trial with a case this clear? who exactly will be the presidents witnesses? those who testify he didnt do what he appears to have done and would never do it? so, how would republicans strategize this? and im hearing now thought congressman cannot hear me right now. so ...

Ukraine told him he had to be fired as the aid to ukraine was being held by joe biden. >> shannon: there are one hundred pages >> our printers are going overtime. >> shannon: we will come back to you. now to trace gallagher. he has information on what we are expecting from the horowitz report and durham has well. >> for the better part of 20 months michael horowitz has been looking into in 2016 the doj and fbi legally obtained a fisa warrant to surveil trump campaign aid carter page. the "washin...

Diplomacy around the world at stake. so what i will say is the judiciary is awaiting the report, as you know from the resolution -- house resolution 660. we will receive a report from the intelligence committee as well as any other committee of oversight and from that we will draft articles of impeachment. >> sandra: all right. so where do you stand, congressman, on what you heard over the past couple of weeks. i believe it was over 31 hours of public impeachment hearings do you believe what you...

Thats why the president on this program 56 minutes was the total interview. talked about the release of this inspector general report of what it means. listen. >> you have a fisa report coming out. which the word is its historic. thats what i hear. and if its historic, you are going to see something. and then perhaps even more importantly, you have durham coming out shortly thereafter. he is the u.s. attorney and he has already announced its criminal. and well see what happens. >> mr. president....

>> sandra: more on mr. cline smith and what he did here. he took an email from an official at another federal agency that contained several factual assertions. then added material to the bottom that looked like another assertion from the emails author when, it was, instead, his own understanding. mr. clinesmith include compiled for another official to read in signing an affidavit that would be submitted to the court attesting to the facts and analysis in the wiretap application. obviously we are...

Narrative that this is automatically a slam dunk for democrats? look, i there it is accurate to report that you did have witnesses who testified that said there was a quid pro quo. even some democrats are -- or excuse me some republicans are out there saying that that did take place. the reporting is to say that automatically that must mean there was criminal intent. that this was for a personal gain by donald trump. and that was not proven. so, i think when it comes to the reporting of this, it...