Them gavel to gavel, but my perception, and i think the perception of many were those very concerns in those cases. But i think whats far more important is to survey the people that were involved in a particular case, the lawyers, the witnesses, i mean, the things that our pilot is going to do. Their perceptions, i think, are much more compelling and persuasive than the perceptions of somebody who is watching it on tv, who doesnt know all the facts, who doesnt know what that witness testified to in a deposition and whether theyre shading their testimony now when theyre in front of television camera. We may not. Viewers may not know that but the parties involved on whose bhaf your speaking, the concerns of the parties involved, certainly we would have these are issues that would have come up time and time again, wouldnt they . As we televise trials all over the country, many of them high profile . All i can tell you, sir, is i think its important to survey people. Im not aware in the st
2010. Before that, audio from one term generally wasnt available until the beginning of the next term and so i was wondering, whats your view on the impact of having these audio recordings available now publicly within the same week of the argument and has there been an improvement in Public Access . Well, it certainly a good first step, but when were talking about the age of the internet, when someone can tweet something and millions of people can see it and read it and share it seconds after its been sent, especially in news when youre talking about something well release it that week. I mean, in the news business, a week later is really yesterdays news. So, for the people that really rl interested and there are a surprising amount of them that whether theyre shutins or just people interested in the way that we conduct ourselves in the judiciary, i think at least having simultaneous broadcast of the audio might be a good first start. I just have a problem again with the audio only. N
Conversation is accurate. My background in this is, there are two influences, i suppose. So i grew up in rural gun culture which was black gun culture. So everyone that i knew, all of the, you know, the good people of the community, my grandfather and father were both ministers, both owned guns and so did everybody else in the community really unapologetically. And when i got to law school, i found that there was a quite different impression about something that i took as being sort of one of the clear, fundamental rights and importance of practical resources even before i could articulate something about fundamental rights. So there was this tension that operated in the way that i was sort of dealing with what i knew in my bones versus what i heard in law school and then the kind of cultural response to firearms issues that i got in lots of the venues that i was operating in after law school. So certainly at harvard the sense in the early 80s when i was there was, oh, well, that Secon
For those who missed up in the morning im the Vice President of the atlantic. Have alle lighted to of you here today for the atlantic presents the shriver looking at women on the economic edge, a very, very important issue. I wanted to give a thanks again the companys and organizations that helped to make this possible. Womens nation team, maria and her staff and for American Progress and presenting underwriter the American Federation of teachers supporting underwriters, and thomsonatories reuters. Terrific inen giving up their support. I have gotten lots of good comments and questions and feedback during the break. Keep those coming using whatwomenneed and follow us at atlanta underscore live and report. Also through your comment cards q a and feel free to find any of us after the program. We will go straight through the afternoon. Brace yourselves. We will skip the afternoon break to fit a little more in. You need to get up or get a coffee or stretch your legs, feel free to do so. Ar
Then a country that is collapsing and in response lashing out at dick cheney. Its very close to home. Also in my continuing quest to remind you of the good news about the world out there, two special guests. Swedish professor hans rosling will dazzle you with charts that show a very different world than youve been led to believe you live in. One of bill clintons favorite experts will tell you about the amazing technological advances that are changing the world for the better. But first here is my take. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus speech to the United States congress was eloquent, moving and intelligent in identifying the problems with the potential nuclear deal with iran. But when describing the alternative to it, he entered never neverland, painting a scenario utterly divorced from rye aelt. Congress joined him on his fantasy ride, rapturously applauding as he spun out one unattainable demand after another. Netanyahu declared that washington should reject the current de