Page 27 - Immunity Issue News Today

Negative to try to pursue supreme court involvement. i will say this to have little shred of encouragement for that per the supreme court when they dealt with the immunity issue and jack smith of trying to manipulate the timing of when they would deal with that, they seemed very cognizant of this went all the way through oral argument. great cognizant of the idea that law fair is breaking out around them. they knew the context of what was happening with the made their decision to not take the ex...

Negative to try to pursue supreme court involvement. i will say this to have little shred of encouragement for that per the supreme court when they dealt with the immunity issue and jack smith of trying to manipulate the timing of when they would deal with that, they seemed very cognizant of this went all the way through oral argument. great cognizant of the idea that law fair is breaking out around them. they knew the context of what was happening with the made their decision to not take the ex...

Negative to try to pursue supreme court involvement. i will say this to have little shred of encouragement for that per the supreme court when they dealt with the immunity issue and jack smith of trying to manipulate the timing of when they would deal with that, they seemed very cognizant of this went all the way through oral argument. great cognizant of the idea that law fair is breaking out around them. they knew the context of what was happening with the made their decision to not take the ex...

When he said i want the supreme court to get involved, what is he talking about? >> theres no guarantee any direct appeal or any appeal from this conviction would land at the supreme court. it might if constitutional issues are raised but its not an appeal, theres not even an appeal to the highest state appellate court in the state of new york which is called the court of appeals. so you need a federal constitutional reason to get into the supreme court. >> does that not apply to this, he was no...

Immunity issue could potentially affect all of these cases. its not likely to affect this case. and we dont know what the supreme court will say on that case which is pending and has to come out in the next few weeks. all i can tell you is that i dont think either side will get exactly what they want. i dont think federal prosecutors will say theres no such thing as presidential immunity and i dont think the trump slide will get a decision that everything a president does that hes immune from pr...

He has his allies smearing juror who is have been seated. >> and he should be put in a cell for that. he should be put in a cell and contemplate his behavior. i agree that peoples fear of intimidation or physical harm is a key factor here. but i dont think the members of of supreme court are worried about physical intimidation, t even at that level, hes getting judicial accommodations that other people dont get. they are taking their time deciding the immunity issue and i dont think they are tak...

Ex-president had requested case be pushed back till the supreme court reviews his claim to presidential immunity in a separate case

Over similar claims . Well, its a little confusing. This case tomorrow, sorry on tuesday starting, actually was filed first in 2019, so it was the first defamation of miss carroll. And that was put on hold because actually the doj was arguing that he might have had president ial immunity. And so, he defamed her again, and that case went to trial last april. And that was also a Rape Case that went to trial last april. And the jury in that case found him liable, not for rape, but did find him liab...

The first defamation of miss carroll. and that was put on hold because actually, the doj was arguing that he might have had presidential immunity. and so, he defamed her again, and that case went to trial last april. and that was also a rape case that went to trial last april. and the jury in that case found him liable, not for rape, but did find him liable for sexual assault that he literally grabbed miss carroll by the intimate parts, and defamed her, and got $5 million. so because there were ...

Presidency until you leave the presidency. what about that argument? >> its a very serious argument that president trump has raised. actually he has raised it in the jack smith prosecution here in washington. going to be an oral argument held on that tomorrow in the court of appeals for the d.c. circuit. >> laura: whats the panel, do you know? >> its two biden judges and a bush one judge. its a pretty heavily biden they have the majority. >> laura: think thought on where that will go, do you thi...