Entry. So you did not tested prior to october 1 . No, sir. Again that hearing you can see in its entirety tonight at 8 00 p. M. Eastern on cspan. And yesterday the house energy and commerce subcommittee on communications and Technology Held a hearing on wired communications and internet protocolbased networks. Some of the topics discussed include the telecommunication laws surrounding those networks as well as the impact of Communications Advancements on consumers and businesses. This is a little more than two hours. [inaudible conversations] we will call the subcommitsubcommit tee on communications and technology to order and begin our hearing on the evolution of wired Communications Networks. Wired Communications Networks have come a long way since the days of the telegraph or the rotary phone. It is getting harder and harder to remember at a time when you wanted to reach out and touch someone ma bell twisted copper wires were the only option. Todays consumers have so many more optio
Women, traditionally religious women left out. Critiques of feminism and feminism in contemporary American Culture led critics to label her antifeminist. Sunday, your questions live for three hours at noon eastern, and looking ahead to the new year on indepth, join mark levin january 5th. Booktvs indepth, the first sunday of every month on cspan2. Next, a hearing on a bill requiring greater disclosure of surveillance programs offered by the nsa. One of the witnesses from google said the bill is needed to restore Global Confidence in his firm and others which have been harmed by corporations that were with the nsa. This is a little more than an hour and a half. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] okay. You ready . Yep. This hearing will come to order. Welcome to the Senate Judiciary Sub Committee on privacy, technology, and the law. The subject of the hearing is the surveillance Transparency Act of 2013. Im proud to say that two weeks ago i reintroduced this bill with th
Line of the balance between transparency and National Security. Well have to have testimony from privacy people and google to talk about thatting a gra gags. I dont think that is all that helpful because you really are not giving people an idea of how much is youre mixing apples and oranges. How many wiretaps and mobsters. To me it it doesnt create the kind of transparency that creates the kind of knowledge the American People. I have some time. I guess i can go. Over my own time. I have seconds and will try to answer a question. I understand that you think that my bill would require too much e detail. Im going to weigh that feedback very carefully. But i do want to point out that when i drafted the government reporting requirements and the bill i modelled them after the wiretap report that they release every year. If you look at last years report it breaks down the number of wiretaps by specific jurisdiction and breaks down those numbers by the nature of the wiretap. Last years wireta
The companies on an annual basis to publish these statistics, it its going to simply provide Additional Information out there as new Companies Come online and pop up you may have a company that for a period of years shows no orders and then all of a sudden starts showing orders and that conveys a message that says, we have the capability to collect this now. The more detail we provide out there and the more we break this down by authorities and companies, the more easy it becomes for our adversaries to know where to talk and where not to talk. What we have agreed to allow the companies to do is to report the aggregate number of times in which they provide information to the government and that seems to me is an adequate way of providing the public the information they need to know about the minuscule proportion of times in which that actually happens and breaking it down nurt in our view crosses the line of the balance between transparency and National Security. Well have to have testi
Details. Dana, what is mueller asking here . Reporter cnn learned the special council, Robert Mueller sent a letter to the White House Council this week asking white house staff to save all documents relating to the june, 2016 meeting at trump tower with donald trump jr. , Jared Kushner, Paul Manafort and a russian lawyer. According to a source i spoke with who has seen the letter and read it to me, the request pertains to any subjects discussed in the course of the meeting and also any decisions made regarding recent disclosures about the june, 2016 meeting. Muellers letter clearly connect this is request to the larger russia investigation. As you are aware, we are investigating the russian governments efforts to interfere in the 2016 president ial election, including links and coordination of individuals with donald trump. Any information concerning the june 2016 meeting between donald trump jr. Is relevant to the investigation. Now, this preservation request inclutes text messages,