Page 130 - Impartiality News Today

Accountable if he didnt even understand his own laws? it was the last desperate stand of a desperate man. he tried to treat the committee of the public like idiots. he knew the rules. he broke them and then he lied about it afterwards. not content with these most dishonourable actions, his behaviour during a dark his investigation has been almost contemptible. he has deployed the full trump handbook of trying to burn those around him to save his own skin. not only did the committee found that he...

That which is said of us? when somebody is in court they are allowed to say that the court has made a mistake and the protections of courts, of thejunior courts with juries sitting in them, are quite rightly very strict. but you can still say that the court has got it wrong. indeed, youre allowed to say its got it so wrong youre going to appeal. you dont have to kowtow but for some reason the privileges committee thinks its in communist china and that we must kowtow. and then they go on to say t...

Answer appendix three. im sure youre all listening in following very carefully. appendix three is the letter of mrjohnson in response to the draft report. fascinatingly, although in paragraph six on page 100 questions the impartiality of the committee, annex one ignores that. it answers lots of other points but it brushes over this point, perhaps because it thought that it was on relatively thin ice. of that it was on relatively thin ice. of course i will give way. he obviously — of course i w...

Simon caldwell thought so. sorry, bbc news. why on earth are your headlines repeatedly emphasising that the former pm is appalled at being forced out? you should be highlighting very clearly that he misled parliament. but this person found a bias in the other direction. yet again bbc news shows its blatant lack of impartiality in its reporting of the borisjohnson report. having hounded him for over two years, repeatedly emphasising and spectating on every negative they could find or invent, they...

And what he might be seeking here in terms of getting this prolonged into the political season. so i thought the fact that she seemed to seize the bull by the words own issue an order that was a relatively tight scheduling order, was a good sign. i also sought is an indication that she doesnt seem to have any plans to recuse herself, to disqualify herself based on the concern about the, at least the appearance of partiality here. i think we learned two things. >> nick, you told me on tv, and the...

Quickly. the wildcard is judge, cnn judge aileen cannon, the trump appointee, not just a trump appointee, but someone who has already been overturned on the basis of showing too much partiality to president trump, former president trump. judge cannon is to recruit herself from this, case that is what needs to happen. the question, is whether the prosecution will move for it or not. the rules for recusal, the standards for recusal, whether it could look as though someones partiality could be in q...

Trump indictment if he had any hand in indicting the former president on these 37 counts. not a lot of clarity in his answer. take a listen to what he had to say. >> so, as you know, i cant talk about particular -- particulars of this or any other ongoing criminal matter. as i said when i appointed mr. smith, did i so because it underscores justice departments department to oath, independence and accountability. >> carley: congressman, there is a special counsel but he answers to the attorney ge...

Certainly of concern of people in the intelligence community. so thats another factor. the article also noted that she gets a little uptight or has a strong reaction sometimes when shes questioned or challenged. and this is a very complicated case, maybe the most important highest profile political case in history or maybe just in a very long time, so all of those factors have certainly raised some concern from legal experts out there, and i expect people will continue to dig into that as we wat...

I add unfair because not because i think it would be unfair, i think they want the perception of the public to be that they are doing everything as by the book. and if they come in right off the back and seek recusal i think that attracts a little bit from them just saying regulated chips fall where they may. now that said if we start this process of discovery, if we start going through motions and there are adverse rulings where the judge says, for example, im not going to let you put into evid...

That any reasonable observer would question her impartiality, that could not only result in a reversal but potentially the 11th circuit involving themselves in pushing her to recuse. >> to be clear, even if the 11th circuit were not explicitly asked to force the recusal effectively of a judge if they decided to on a matter that was appealed to them they could exercise that discretion. >> i think they could. and it could be if the decision itself also showed such bias, the government could seek t...