Page 172 - Impartiality News Today

Are coming from the russian side when they are talking _ about the reasons for this invasion. and i think failure to do that means that youre not giving _ the audience the correct story. its really interesting to see, if you look back to 2014 - and the annexation of crimea and how the language that the media - uses now, talking back- to what happened back then, is so much clearer. whereas back in 2014 it was a bit i of a sort of a grey area, you know, in some of the reporting of what was going o...

And the obvious point here is them saying to almost the day before the invasion of ukraine, they werent going to invade when the evidence was there. yeah. and just briefly, i mean, when it comes to you as a ukrainian journalist reporting in ukraine, is impartiality even something you aim for in your reporting? well, definitely, you know, as journalists who have to stick to the facts and, as i said, separate our emotions and know our feelings and the way that we are as citizens of ukraine affecte...

Being under criminal investigation by the justice department. the same former president who could be a future president, could be a candidate again in the future in the 2024 presidential election. there are so many factors at play here. we gave that trump line earlier thatthe democrats were weaponising the intelligence community against the former president. give us some balance. how has the community done with their impartiality, political impartiality here? i mean, look, donald trump has long ...

Justice department. the same former president who could be a future president, could be a candidate again in the future in the 2024 presidential election. there are so many factors at play here. we gave that trump line earlier that the democrats were weaponising the intelligence community against the former president. give us some balance. how has the community done with their impartiality, political impartiality here? i mean, look, donald trump has long accused intelligence community of trying ...

Uses now, talking back- to what happened back then, is so much clearer. whereas back in 2014 it was a bit i of a sort of a grey area, you know, in some of the reporting of what was going on. . i think because maybe it was, i you know, governments couldnt believe what was happening right at the beginning and nato- was very slow to respond. so i think yeah, i think i do think that the west the russian - perspective is portrayed, but in context. _ 0k. and nic, i mean, we talk a lot about impartiali...

When they are talking about i the reasons for this invasion. and i think failure to do thatj means that youre not giving the audience the correct story. its really interesting to see, if you look back to 2014 - and the annexation of crimea and how the language - that the media uses now, - talking back to what happened back then, is so much clearer. whereas back in 2014 it was a bit of a sort i of a grey area, you know, in some of the reporting i of what was going on. i think because maybe it was...

Of ukraine, they werent going to invade when the evidence was there. yeah. and just briefly, i mean, when it comes to you as a ukrainianjournalist reporting in ukraine, is impartiality even something you aim for in your reporting? well, definitely, you know, as journalists who have to stick to the facts and, as i said, separate our emotions and know our feelings and the way that we are as citizens of ukraine affected by this war. from our reporting, i mean, of course, in the opinion pieces, we c...

Decide to release a redacted version of the mar-a-lago affidavit. now, former president trump says the documents search violated his fourth amendment protection against illegal search and seizure. you have trumps council telling a conservative radio show host, mark levin, that they are considering firing a motion to appoint a special master to review documents that were seized by the fbi. whats the special master to? what is the endgame? >> a special master is someone who would look at the evide...

Bolster this narrative that you continue to hear from the trump camp around the doj and the fbi having been politicized and weaponized against us. so it is really an attempt to continue to control the narrative, so that the public sides with donald trump even though statistically it is showing that the public wants these investigations to continue. donald trump is trying to control the narrative here, just in case the outcome isnt something that he likes. he will be able to point to the notion o...

Suggest the notion of impartiality, both on the doj, and i would not be surprised if, at least early on, if they were granted a special master, and it wasnt going their way, they see the same thing made about the special master. all of this is a means of trying to control the narrative and remain in control of it and be flexible in a way where you can lead your followers wherever you want to go, regardless of the outcome of what happened in the court of law. >> frank, i want to go back to someth...