Page 119 - Impeachment Process News Today

Week. >> i wanted to change subjects and talk about something that professor turley raised last week. the partisan nature of this investigation. you are an experienced congressional investigator. >> professor turley is no trump supporter. >> thats right. he is a democrat. thats right. but professor turley cautioned that a partisan inquiry is not what the founders envisioned; is that correct? >> yes correct. >> and our democrat friends are citing the founders and their intent as part of this impe...

The gentlemen with the gray hair is a republican from ohio on the house intel committee and then two seats down from him is devin nunes who is the ranking chair for the republicans on the house intel committee, sandra. >> sandra: you watch all thats happening on capitol hill as we anticipate the release of the i.g. report and details of it. a big day in washington >> it is. in the middle you had representative conway from the judiciary committee. theyre watching this. never before have we been i...

Turns on the dossier and what role the dossier played in the ongoing surveillance also, so we will see what the ig says about this also. jillian: seems like, i dont know, call me crazy, seems like each time we have something like, this everybody is expecting a bombshell, nobody is really expecting that today because we have been a time or two, we are spiraling in the circle that seems out of control that is never coming to an end, do you expect the same outcome? >> you know, jillian, youre exact...

Of this impeachment process. >> i think that goes to the -- this -- whether this constitutes bribery. you know, theres case law on bribery and im no supreme court scholar or lawyer or advocate, but theres new case law with the mcdonald case about what constitutes an official act and that hasnt beenac addressed in this space and i think professor turleyss mentioned it. >> right. i think professor turley said that a meeting certainly does notng constitute an owe fishts act. >> i think its the a mc...

Remove the son of a political opponent from any investigation involving ukraine? >> absolutely. this all goes to the heart of bias. >> thank you for those answers. mr. chairman, i -- i go back to what you said this morning about the facts being undisputed. i would argue that the facts, in fact, are disputed.e and what you contend are facts are, in acfact, not. they are witnessct presumptions hearsay, and speculation. and the facts here are, in fact, that this is the shortest impeachment in u.s. ...

Schiffs spokesman acknowledged publicly that the outlines of the whistle-blowers accusations against thes president had bee disclosed to the house intelligence staff and shared with chairman schiff. mr. castor, is that disclosure and mr. bowlens admission of that disclosure anywhere in this report? >> i dont remember seeing it. >> its not. >> i>> think all members of congress should be held accountable during this impeachment process. and to that end, if i have made any falseve statements about ...

Certainly takes longer than 76 days. the democrats instructed special witnesses that if they did not cooperate in full, it shall constitute evidence of obstruction. finally, there is no basis for obstruction. the one witness who said he spoke toct president trump abou his witness ambassador sondland hold him the president told him to cooperate and tell the truth. the president has declassified and released the call summary of his calls with president zelensky. the white house wrote to speaker pe...

President clinton, ken starr politician or politician very interviewed white house staff. witness or lawyer versus witness, and we got today in the president clinton also provided written responses to 81 impeachment process to lawyer interrogatories from the house versus lawyer. let me show you the highlights. judiciary committee. judiciary committee staff questioning those intelligence unlike his predecessors, committee lawyers, which led to president trump has even some strange moments. catego...

Know better than this. but they are not even able to say that his behavior was inappropriate. you might remember when they tried to do that and the president slapped them back. and so they are left in the completely embarrassing and untenable position of having to defend it. so they cant really argue in substance. so what they do is they just argue and say, well, okay, its true, he did this, but it really wasnt that bad. he robbed a bank, but, you know, maybe its not really a crime because he ga...

The "washington post" story, talked about the issue of the fiso warrants and particularly the steele dossier. the steele dossier the fbi said, we had used christopher steele before, and he was a reliable witness, but the report says something about well, this time, he wasnt the actual witness to anything, he was getting secondhand information, was that information checked out, so while i dont think there is, there is not going to be a smoking gun for republicans in, there i think theyre going to...