Yesterday, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
struck down the CDC Eviction Order as unconstitutional, ruling “[t]he CDC order must be set aside.” The Department of Justice intends to appeal this ruling.
As with the other similar rulings across the nation striking down the CDC Eviction Order, there are questions regarding whether this ruling will have limited application to only the named plaintiffs or will apply nationwide, whether the ruling will be stayed pending the appeal, and whether the Iowa Supreme Court will modify its prior Implementation Orders regarding the CDC Eviction Order. Notably, this most recent ruling from the District of Columbia could potentially have broader application than the prior similar rulings. More details to follow in the upcoming days and weeks.
On March 29, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
extended the September 4
CDC Order, which temporarily halted certain residential nonpayment evictions, through
June 30, 2021. It was previously set to expire on March 31. In addition, on March 29, the Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a
CDC’s March 29 Extension Order
Specifically, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky signed a
17-page Order extending the September 4 CDC Order until June 30. Therein, Director Walensky explained:
[D]espite higher rates of vaccine coverage, the simultaneous roll-back of community mitigation efforts may continue to expose vulnerable populations, such as those targeted in this Order, to higher-than-average COVID-19 rates. . . This 90-day extension will allow the assessment of natural changes to COVID-19 incidence, influence of new variants, and the expansion of COVId-19 vaccine coverage to determine if there is a continued need for a national ev
office, acronym is voice, they wreak allocate advocate resources currently targeted to illegal aliens and switch those to victims of illegal immigrant crime which may be a little controversial. on the border while, immediately begins planning, design and maintenance construction using materials originating to the fullest extent of the law, materials from the united states, it will begin building and if you places. el paso, texas, el centro, california, landing mask fencing they use there is obsolete to president trump was at the museum of african-american history earlier this morning where he gave us a few words on the implementation orders coming from dhs, here s the president. we have to have a safe country. we have to let people come and that are going to love the country. this is about love. this building is about love. after have people coming who are going to love the country not harm the country.
budding and el paso, texas, tucson, arizona, and el centro california where they ve been using vietnam era temporary helicopter landing pads, really outdated and ineffective, a lot of people say the fence there is more of a suggestion than anything. the aclu is the first public reaction that we have seen to these new implementation orders from dhs, saying these memos confirm that the trump administration is willing to trample on due process, human decency, the well-being of our communities and even protections for vulnerable children in pursuit of a hyper- aggressive mast deportation policy. coming later on this week is the president s newly written and rewritten executive order on extreme vetting, the so-called immigration band that got caught up in a number of courts, ninth circuit court of appeals really put the kibosh on it, refusing to release this day from a district judge in seattle. our correspondent thinks that