Good afternoon everyone. This is the december 13th 2013 meeting of the lafco for the city and county of San Francisco our clerk is miss lisa miller could you please call the role. Commissioner breed. Present. Commissioner mar. Present. We do have a quorum. Item number 2 is approval of the minutes for the september 27th 2013 regular meeting. I see no comments lets open this up for Public Comment is there anyone from the public who would like to speak . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Miss miller please call item number 3. The cleanpowersf program and the California Public Utilities Commission and cleanpowersf Energy Efficiency and facilities and local jobs patrols strategies and. Maybe thank you mr. Chair typically we start the status with the status of the puc and barbara hail is here to provide that to you. Thank you. Most of our activities recently on the cca front for in puc proceedings where pg and es green tariff option has continued to move forward. Developing a green rate
Item number 2 is approval of the minutes for the september 27th 2013 regular meeting. I see no comments lets open this up for Public Comment is there anyone from the public who would like to speak . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Miss miller please call item number 3. The cleanpowersf program and the California Public Utilities Commission and cleanpowersf Energy Efficiency and facilities and local jobs patrols strategies and. Maybe thank you mr. Chair typically we start the status with the status of the puc and barbara hail is here to provide that to you. Thank you. Most of our activities recently on the cca front for in puc proceedings where pg and es green tariff option has continued to move forward. Developing a green rate the statute requires a Commission Decision by july so we are expecting that the commission will need to issue at least a proposed decision in the april time frame in order to meet that statute requirement at this point we would expect pg and es projected g
Motion carries. Its been moved and seconded. Any Public Comment on these items . This item is closed. Are these trails that we passed years ago . No these are trails by san mateo county. Division management and this was for easement. They manage the trail and pedestrian bicycle and people and dogs. Any other questions, commissioners . I move the record show that it been moved and seconded. Is that okay . All in favor say, aye. Aye. The motion carries. Madam secretary. Next item. 13. Approve the terms and conditions and authorize the general manager to execute a purchase and Sale Agreement and any related document to facilitate the purchase of approximately 84 acres of have approved agricultural land. The date should read november 4, 2013, and well make that change on the final resolution. Thank you madam secretary. Commissioners . When were we briefed on this item before . Its closed section. Thats why we cant talk about it. I knew something was closed in my mind. I will entertain a mo
No material weaknesses were found. We certainly are managing our funds appropriately and we can also provide you Additional Details in the new year in 2014 through the budget process, which we will be kicking off rather soon in february, actually, in term of reports of our balances, how weve been doing over the course of the last year so we can look forward to that in the new year. And then lastly, im really pleased as were wrapping up all the significant accomplishments. I think its almost a year to the date or so that this commission has been installed and were moving at quite a fast clip here. And i am pleased to announce another advancement. In the shipyard, the developer there, lennar, has informed us that they are proceeding with construction. Theyve secured outside lender financing for block 53 and 54 which you provided a Design Review approval, the vertical dba approval for those blocks, include 54 townhomes, 105 flats and they are expected to be complete in april 2015. Well ha
Function well. If that can be helped by the committee, that will be very helpful to mostly young patients. I would want to second that. I agree. I think if there could be because the specific needs of dialysis patients, it is such they are so unique to their disease in comparison to other disabilities. Also because its often so misunderstood by folks in the general public who again look at a person and they dont look like anything is wrong with them. Employment is a very big issue. I dont know if there could be a special department or some sort of support for folks who were on dialysis and either finding employment and also advocating for them with their employers as well that they are not being lazy, they are not cutting out of work early. There is a significant disability that they are coping with that is preventing them from working a normal schedule. That would be very helpful finding employment as well. Transportation absolutely and i would add greater access to Mental Health care