Page 497 - Implementation News Today

When we are together with the united states can play decisive and we mentioned the situation in afghanistan, and the situation with implementation of the agreements in the ukraine. we continue working in accordance with those issues to seek for the road to resolve the problems and to take into account the interests of all of the interested parties and we also discussed our relations which are not in the best condition because of a lot of efforts to undermine those and we have to and we have to d...

People are dangerous, judges tend to defer to that kind of conclusion. >> ken, i see you nodding your head. do you believe that sally yates was on any firm legal ground when she refused to -- >> no, and also understand while the attorney general is unique in the cabinet, and they need to make independent legal decisions, prosecution decisions, for instance, when the president gives a directive, the question is this legally defensible. and that is the standard that sally yates applied. your optio...

Says these people are dangerous its -- judges tend to defer to that kind of -- that kind of conclusion. >> can -- i see youre nodding your head do you believe that sally yates was on firm legal drowned. >> no i dont. and also understand while the attorney general is unique in the cabinet they do need to make independent legal decisions for instance prosecution decisions and so forth when the president gives a directive the standard is is this legally defensible not will i win or do i agree with ...

Was mentioned by senator durbin this order was was -- was after a lawsuit from the state of washington and minnesota, the court basically challenged the constitutionality of the order. the order is not taken effect, but what i want to get to right now is the fact that the administration then withdrew its request for an appeal of the court ruling, blocking implementation of the same order and then they changed the order that you would not implement. >> right, and there were a number of important ...

>> we have 440,000 people covered by expanded medicaid alone. all of them would be in jeopardy because the bill that the republicans passed through the house cuts medicaid funding by 20%. the only way to deal is cut people off the rolls completely or reducing the benefits they get. a lot of people in the commonwealth of kentucky will be jeopardized by that provision alone. you talk about the additional implementation of things like the high risk pool. one estimate from the keyser foundation in k...

Actually gone down since the implementation of the starns. this can be done and its time we do it. we need to move forward, not backwards. >> good debate there. thank you both for joining us. a quick programming note. be sure to watch former president barack obama receive the profile in courage award tomorrow night. well be right back. coming back on my long-term control medicine. i talked to my doctor and found a missing piece in my asthma treatment with breo. once-daily breo prevents asthma sy...

With what we voted for why it came to the floor when it did is a question for leadership but this has been a long time coming, i feel vindicated having been opposed to the original aca. we were told it was this or nothing, now or never and we knew that wasnt the case. if you want proof that the aca was broken beyond iowa losing all their providers, look at the -- follow the money and look at aetna and anthem who had in the years following the implementation of the affordable care act 165% and 85...

And we will never, ever stand for religious discrimination, never, ever. no american should be forced to choose between the dictate of the federal government and the tenets of their faith. this executive order directs the irs not to unfairly target churches or religious organizations for political speech. >> juan: strong words for the president. but guess what? some on the right, the right are criticizing order from not going far enough and some on the left are upset too, the aclu saying they ar...

Anymore. and we will never, ever stand for religious discrimination, never, ever. no american should be forced to choose between the dictate of the federal government and the tenets of their faith. this executive order directs the irs not to unfairly target churches or religious organizations for political speech. >> juan: strong words for the president. but guess what? some on the right, the right are criticizing order from not going far enough and some on the left are upset too, the aclu sayin...

For religious discrimination,an never, ever. no american should be forced to choose between the dictate of the federal governmentri and the tenets of their faith. this executive order directs the irs not to unfairly target churches or religious organizations for political speech. >> juan: strong words for the president. but guess what? some on the right, the right are criticizing order from not going far enough and some on the left are upset too, the aclu saying they are monitoring the implement...