Page 259 - Implication News Today

0 the secretary stated and the five million that was on a public facing website was that the information on the website was incomplete because four kuntys had not uploaded their data. >> so no credibility? >> zero to that. >> during that call, did scott perry mentioned mr. clark and what did he say about him if so? >> he mentioned mr. clark. he said something to the effect of i think jeff clark is great and i think hes the kind of guy that can get in there and do something about this stuff. this...

About president trumps suggestion that rusty bowers had said to him that the election was rigged and president trump suggesting that he hopes somebody was recording it. mr. bowers said categorically that is completely false. >> yeah, he said -- confirmed they did have this phone call in january 2020 but said he did not tell trump the election was rigged. he did not tell him that he had won the state of arizona, which of course he did not. the implication from trump that there was a tape is somet...

Recording it. mr. bowers said categorically that is completely false. >> yeah, he said -- confirmed they did have this phone call in january 2020, but said he did not tell trump the election was rigged. he did not tell him that he had won the state of arizona, which of course he did not. the implication from trump that there was a tape is something weve seen from him before. of course, remember with the form er fbi director james come, there was not a tape in that situation. its sometimes a thre...

It wouldnt be true. >> question, the statement has a defamatory implication about mr. depp. answer, yes. the court is adjourned. thank you. >> in the end, the jury believed johnny depp, awarding him more than $10 million in damages. amber won a single defamation claim in her countersuit and was awarded $2 million. >> there is no polite way to say it, the jury looked at the evidence you presented, they listened to your testimony and they did not believe you, they thought you were lying. >> how co...

Bidens win. he proceeded to pressure pence anyway. even though eastman is not testifying for the committee, can his seeking of that pardon, it does not do? is that an admission of guilt? how does that change the narrative that both trump and eastman are putting out there that this is all good? >> the committee does not operate under the rules that i would have to operate under as a prosecutor. there is no limitation on these sorts of evidence that they can introduce. they have used this particul...

Election. and any implication that she has with john eastman and the work he was spearheading. what is really weird about this is that it took the committee such a long time, even just to send a thomas a polite letter and not a subpoena to ask her to come in and answer a few questions. for months now, we know that ginni thomas is connected to the scheme to overturn the election results. this has not been a secret whatsoever. despite that this committee has been unusually aggressive in so many ot...

And hes trying to get pence to not count of the votes. he was told that law was not in his favor. my mind goes to criminal intent. we are not getting to the point of telling raffensperger 11,700 votes. we are not getting to the fact that he sat watching tv for three hours gleefully while the mob out there was ransacking the capitol. there are so many ways to get at criminal intent here. they are all reinforcing. i am a little more optimistic. >> im going to throw something back at you. you wrote...

Failure on the people who didnt use it and thenha the product after it failed us . this is cognitive dissonance. its groupthink. frankly, it is rather cultic well. crazy. its distorting peoples brains. i mean, look, im serious. im not f against vaccines the idea of vaccines or whatever , but if something is failing right in frontt of me and you refuse to acknowledge it, why would i ever trust you w again? well, thats the key.? whats the definition of vaccine for one hundred years prior to covid,...

Came before them. this was never gonna come before them, or at least, they would never agree to review it. so, john eastman contended, they could just pull off this block. they could just do it, even though its against the law, because the supreme court would never stop them. these conversations happened in the presence of the president himself. the implication of that is that president trump, himself, knew that the plan was to try to pull off an illegal plot in the expectation of the supreme co...

Reviewed by the supreme court. he acknowledges they would lose nine to nothing at the supreme court. unconstitutional, illegal, and he knows that. but the crucial point we learned today for the first time is that these guys did not necessarily see that as a problem. because the trump lawyer, john eastman, said he believed didnt matter that the court which strike it down 9 to 0 if it came before them. this was never gonna come before them, or at least, they would never agree to review it. so, joh...