Page 341 - Implication News Today

Kelly and tillerson saying they were dismissive of her. they accused her at least by implication of trying to go around them. there is one very funny bit where he says he has four secretaries of sate, her, rex tillerson who was the secretary of state, jared kushner and hr halderman and he says i only need one. so there are a few bits, and there is quite a lot of personal reflection and some tantalizing ideas. >> you write about hailys response to president trump after the deadly charleston.

The implication is that bolton has, he and mick mulvaney, all roads seem to be leading more to mick mulvaney, the thing with mick, he seems loyal and agrees with the president and bolton had policy differences, whether it is troops to venezuela or iran or series of policy differences. i read the letter several times. you can say one, this is a brushback to the white house and say look, i know a lot. it is another way to look at it though and say, hes saying because he knows so much, therefore ex...

Believed that stone was sort of orchestrating the release of this stolen democratic e-mails. bannon said that when wikileaks released the e-mails from the clinton campaign chairman john podesta on october 7th,2016, he said he heard that stone had been involved in making that happen. and then bannons assistant on the same day sent stone an e-mail that said well-done, just two words. so they kind of thought that stone was actually helping them actively, which is quite striking. >> whats the implic...

A business problem, you would say, yeah, resources with 61%, not four. >> but politics isnt logical and like a business. i think thats the argument that you are hearing. i have talked to sources on both sides of the aisle and they are raising questions about strategically does this actually make sense with the way that politics works today, with the way that coverage works today, yes, donald trump skipped a debate in what he was had a candidate. he was already in the race fully and wholeheartedl...

>> right? its totally obvious what happened. an impeachment inquiry was obvious given what the founders wanted this to be about. >> whether theyre going to remove him, thats a -- >> you know whats missing. the thing thats still missing. people will be like, oh, come on, the implication -- i get it. but im saying whats missing clearly is "the president told me if i dont get what i want, there is no aid." thats whats missing. >> okay. i got to run because i got a big show. but ill see you at the w...

Theory, okay, it was wrong. what happened was wrong, but the president didnt do it? >> ive been talking about that on the show. ive been saying that, that air force one is going to back up over rudy giuliani, forward, back, forward, back, and whoever else gets in the presidents way because this president doesnt want to fall. hes going to have a fall guy. hes going to say he was framed or something or theyre going to come up with some other excuse. but i think the evidence is all there. if you go...

Working out. are republicans saying everything is fine because a plan was thwarted by the whistle-blower? >> that seems to be some implication here. look, it all happened, nothing to look at here, lets move on. as ryan said, its not an impeachable offense so i dont think thats the direction theyre going. i would like to make one point on sondland. he stumbles around, makes himself a mark for foreign powers. it sounds a lot like the description of president trump. and you can kind of see presiden...

And bannon says, i think we did, yes. thats remarkable. >> yeah, thats pretty striking. and, you know, bannon didnt only say that the trump campaign was receiving what it thought was inside information on wikileaks from roger stone. he also suggested that they believed that stone was sort of orchestrating the release of this stolen democratic e-mails. bannon said that when wikileaks released the e-mails from the clinton campaign chairman john podesta on october 7th,2016, he said he heard that st...

That? whats the implication of them thinking they were working through stone with wikileaks and ostensibly with the russians who had done the hacking that wikileaks -- the information that wikileaks had? whats the implication of that on those who believe that there was some kind of coordination between the trump campaign and the russians or the trump campaign and julian assange? >> well, the implication i think would be that they tried to cheat, right? one of the biggest questions after the "acc...

Podesta on october 7th, 2016, he said he heard that stone had been involved in making that happen. and then bannons assistant on the same day sent stone an email that said well done, just two words. so they kind of thought that stone was actually helping them actively, which was quite striking. >> whats the implication of that? whats the implication of them thinking they were working through stone with wikileaks and ostensibly with the russians who had done the hacking that wikileaks -- the info...