Page 349 - Implication News Today

>> jonathan, there is -- theres a risk to history in a very narrow drafting of articles and that is does it leave the implication, if you leave out the emoluments violations, that thats okay, does it somehow certify what donald trump has done running a hotel business in washington, for example, taking income from foreign governments that way? does it certify his refusal to obey the law and hand over a very clear law that says treasury department must hand over any tax return that the house ways ...

Attorney generals thinking, told the associated press soon after we all got the transcript of that call, that william barr was, quote, surprised and angry to find out that he had been mentioned so frequently by the president as a key part of this scheme that the president was trying to work out with ukraine. then the justice department, nevertheless, did have to admit that, yeah, him and durham, this prosecutor he assigned to look into the 2016 election, yeah, they have been talking to people in...

Department. william barr, the attorney general, was mentioned over and over again by the president in the call for which he is being impeached, call to the president of ukraine. the president repeatedly describing the attorney general on that call as the person ukraine should work were to provide him what he wanted. the attorney general, or forgive me, a person familiar with the attorney generals thinking, told the associated press soon after we all got the transcript of that call, that william ...

Happened yet, but obviously, his texts, which weve now seen, i think it is crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign, the reason that is so striking, the reason that has become the refrigerator magnet of this scandal thus far is because it really appears like he was putting that in writing in order to make sure there was a record of what was going on. at least from what we can see from the outside, it appears thats what the implication was of that text. from all yo...

Putting that in writing in order to make sure there was a record of what was going on. at least from what we can see from the outside, it appears thats what the implication was of that text. from all you have seen thus far, from being inside these proceedings, are we interpreting that the correct way? >> i think thats right. and i think its important that we understand why it was that bill taylor, a professional diplomat, a guy with diplomacy to do, not anybodys political interests to look after...

Master politician and her ability to understand exactly where the caucus is and what they can support and what the political implications are is unmatched and shes going to be able to marry that with whats the legal case for impeachment of this president? i think her instinct, make it as simple as possible to understand with this umbrella of abuse of power is really helpful. all too often democrats can get bogged down in process arguments and making it a very simple, clear, this is about how tru...

To anyone. thats the message they want to get across to you. that if you stand up against hillary and the power party power brokers, if you stand up to the rich and powerful elite in the war machine, they will discredit your message. >> kennedy: preach it, girl. at 2020 candidate tulsi gabbard hitting back at saying that hillary clinton is "smearing her campaign as payback for endorsing bernie sanders in 2016." this after clinton suggested in an interview that the congresswoman is a russian asse...

Are some methods. we have some understanding that it will be the case, but we dont have enough to know. we want to see the plan. to the president is laying out a plan to make sure that the terrorists do not get released and do more damage and harm. >> dana: congressman scalise, thank you for being here in new york city. a war of words between the old guard and the new blood in the democratic party. what tulsi gabbard had to say regarding hillary clintons implication that she is a russian asset. ...

Leveling this baseless allegation? i think dan crenshaw, the republican congressman, put it all together by saying, look, heres the list of people that arent russian assets. president trump, tulsi gabbard, just about every american because its a stupid accusation, he writes, and yet it has somehow been normalized by the democratic party as a legitimate political attack. anything for power. he makes an important point. and also this is not some wild, left-wing political strategist accusing tulsi ...

With regard to the presidents involvement and making comments, any implication of quid pro quo, i dont see that at all, the president is charged with a responsibility to getting to the bottom of where any election interference originate sod that we can secure the 2020 elections and in order for him to do that he has to look back at 2016 because he cant secure the 2020 election without knowing where the problems came from in 2016. so i think its entirely appropriate to take that action. >> do you...