Page 416 - Implication News Today

The presidents long-time personal lawyer, who worked for him in his real estate business for a decade, whose case has led to the implication of the president in two felonies, he is due to be sentenced tomorrow. he is probably going to prison for a substantial amount of time. presidents campaign chair apparently may not even contest the contention from the special counsels office that he has been lying to prosecutors and investigators even since he has been in jail and has plead guilty to other f...

Implication that judge pauley believes that president trump, individual one, did direct michael cohen to commit that campaign finance fraud. so we are unpacking a lot of what happen ed in the courthous, andrea, and it was over an hour-long hearing, but it certa certainly, president trumps presence, although he was not there was very much felt. >> and to ken delainian, again, the whole effort by the president to distance himself from everybody around him, manafort, flynn, cohen, and these people ...

His family. that is not central about that. donald trump is central to thing. >> trump makes it sound like he was just a dirty business guy that did a little bit of legal work for him. >> youre right and the focus for us right now is on the implication and inferences drawn of donald trumps involvement but what really drove michael cohens sentence was not the campaign finance fraud. what drove it was tax fraud and bank fraud and got the guideline up and thats what we had to work down from and his...

Congressional reporter for the hill. we have cnn chief analyst gloria borger. kaitlan said something so interesting, the idea of what you normally see behind closed doors. this far surpasses i would expect to see behind closed doors. >> there was no decorum. these were people meeting in the oechl offic oval office. remember in home alone the kid middle you are not the boss of me? this is the new world order. there was no decorum and it was melee. it was clear that shuck schumer could barely look...

The something there which is extraordinary. there are times when prosecutors disagree with each other, but they then sit down where they sit down and the department of justice and they resolve it before they go publicly. the special counsel is saying he has been helpful, he has been helpful in information, throughout his contact with the white house. substantial. with the southern district -- and im an alumni of the southern district. im proud of that office. they say in a written pleading that ...

Been given to michael flynn. lets not forget that hes do to file a memo tomorrow. if i were his counsel, i would just file "thank you, i have nothing to say." the prosecutor has already said "give him a sentence of no jail time." they have praised him. the implication is that there is evidence on the president. but the danger is there is an application but there is no specifics. where is the beef? >> harris: at least that we can see, because it so heavily redacted. and you are pointing to what i...

Over a period of a week or two, maybe less, well announce who it will be. we have a lot of people that want the position. >> neil: did you notice chuck schumers president there, with the president saying we have a lot of people that want this position. the president were told is looking at a number of options for that chief of staff post. general john kelly looks to step down by the end of the year. that was news to us to hear that general kelly might stay on longer if that was the implication. ...

In the business. pelosi knows what can and cannot get done in congress. you heard her tell the president she does not think he has the votes to get his $5 billion on republican votes alone, setting aside the senate entirely. so the president better come work with her. then schumer calling his bluff. saying as the president bragged about all the progress he believes has been made along the border if you really think its that good, why dont we just continue funding this for another year, knowing f...

Impeachment clause in the constitution there is the possible implication of this because it says that after the president is impeached and removed from office the president can then be indicted. that would be an implication of possibly that the president should not be indicted while a sitting president. do you think that -- you dont seem to think that is a strong enough implication in the constitution if it is one. >> i think it is not a strong implication. on the contrary it gets things upside ...

Believed the president can be simply because if the founders wanted otherwise, it would be as easy as possible sentence to assert in the constitution, to simply say the president cannot be indicted. but it does seem to me on the impeachment clause in the constitution there is the possible implication of this because it says that after the president is impeached and removed from office the president can then be indicted. that would be an implication of possibly that the president should not be in...