Page 464 - Implication News Today

Took place. comey has said he was not aware and its interesting to get to the bottom of tha able to do that or not is a big outstanding question. >> melissa: comey was under oath when he said he not aware, right? >> i believe so. i know he said it in interviews. i dont recall whether that was also said under oath. >> melissa: i think he said it to congress as well. what would the implication of that be if, in fact -- i mean i know on one hand he will say this guy, the inspector her things. he is...

Long-standing alliance with canada. >>chris: but we are imposing the terror because of national security reasons. that is the implication that some trust canada as a reliable national security partner when it comes to supplying steel and aluminum. >> i dont think we are satisfied yet that they will protect or uphold all of the shipments of steecoming into canada from around the world. could be china, could be brazil and a lot of different places. this trend shipping effort has been troubling to ...

Different responsibilities. one he is the president of the united states. hes the chief executive officer. he has a responsibility to democracy and the rule of law. he always puts his own private interest above. >> here we talk about norms. one reason its never come up before, even if presidents could, most of them wouldnt consider this, they view their responsibilities as higher than this president does. >> they also would seem to take more seriously, the implication of it, stay with me, i want...

Dark, or out of the loop and didnt have all of the information when she made that statement, or if she did have all the information, then she was lying. but it is a helpful reminder for reporters covering this administratindor voters in the public consuming information out of this administration, that just because thesident o someone on his team, his press secretary and adviser, alawyer, says something true,t doesnt actually make it untrue. it may mean the president wishes it hadnt burst out int...

Friendship and our long-standing alliance with canada. >>chris: but we are imposing the terror because of national secuty reasons. that is the implication that somehow we cant trust canada as a reliable national security partner when it comes to supplying steel and aluminum. >> i dont think we are satisfied yet that they will protect or uphold all of the shipments of steel coming into canada from around the world. could be china, could be brazil and a lot of different places. this trend shipping...

Friendship and our long-standing alliance with canada. >>chris: but we are imposing the terror because of national security reasons. that is the implication that somehow we cant trust canada as a reliable national security partner when it comes to supplying steel and aluminum. >> i dont think we are satisfied yet that they will protect or uphold all of the shipments of steel coming into canada from around the world. could be china, could be brazil and a lot of different places. this trend shippi...

Administration, which i asked mike about a short while ago. we just heard my interview with dinesh dsouza about the horrors of the political prosecutions, what he believes, by the obama administration. and his experience certainly has some implication, i think, for the russia investigation, as we might look at this unholy alliance of the fbi director jim comey and doj prosecutors. what do you think about, for lack of a better term, this runaway prosecution that a lot of us are concerned about? >...

Administration which i asked mike mukasey about. judge mukasey thank you for joining us. we just heard my interview with dierb cuccinelli about the horrors of the political prosecutions what he knowledges by the obama administration and his experience certainly has some implication i think for the russia investigation as we look at the unholy alliance of f.b.i. director jim comey and the doj prosecutors. what do you beening the run away prosecution that we are concerned about? >> in a normal cou...

That run throughout the pardons. its a path that still exists in this white house as it has in others. theres a section inside the justice department that is sort of the office of pardons and theres a formal process but this is a different process. the pattern here involves somebody who the president is close with or connected with, going to the president saying would you consider a pardon for this person and the president going back to his councils office and saying take a look at this. >> caro...

This morning he didnt defend the integrity of his daughter but just talked about the implication on him. thats what it always goes back to. >> i want to say in my experience a lot of his language is driven by real animus and anger, and the fact is, is it not, that thats driven by animus and anger on both sides, and im not drawing moral equivalencies between statements but people feel they have license to speak about the other side in a way they didnt before. >> donald trump, this is an objective...