Page 547 - Implication News Today

Washington post tonight has been very careful to not describe the information that trump descbed, to not describe exactly what information trump leaked. they make clear that they know that information but have been very careful about what they published basically the implication is that they are trying to not compound the damage that he is reported to have already done by giving this information to the russians. and the white house tonight is furiously calling the reporting false although it sho...

What is this about? its about the implication that hes working for the russians. what is that? >> congressman maloney: the fact is that he testified falsely and that raised some questions, thats what we want to hear them. >> tucker: theres a couple other points, lets talk about those. one, he recused himself from the russia investigation, the president of the united states said that the firing of the fbi was at least in part or related to that investigation, theres a lot of legitimate questions ...

Theyre being tied into. what the president said, he was being fired in relation to the russian investigation. and the person who recused himself in the russian investigation is getting involved in that firing. to me, that violates the reasons for which he gave a recusal. so there is a whole bunch of twisted and conflicting reasoning going on here. and today did not shed light on that, did not get to the bottom or at least unravel all of this twisted, convoluted reasoning thats been put forth. >>...

With senator chuck schumer of new york. the president has his personal lawyer now, outside lawyer who is apparently defending him on the russia issue. its a new york business and real estate lawyer who has never done defense of a president on a constitutional issue. it is reported that he has bragged that he is the one who got the u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york preet bharrar fired. sourcing this to four peopleal they say are familiar to the conversations and say he has been ...

Himself in the russian investigation is getting involved in that firing. to me, that violates the reasons for which he gave a recusal. so there is a whole bunch of twisted and conflicting reasoning going on here. and today did not shed light on that, did not get to the bottom or at least unravel all of this twisted, convoluted reasoning thats been put forth. >> i want to ask you about the sort of question of collusion. he was extremely indignant -- the attorney general today about any implicatio...

Mueller now and one of the points that they make is that he started to build his team and its a biased team. is there any clear indication that this is a team that is not doing straightforward investigative work? >> theres been no evidence of that to date and nothing approaching a legal conflict. we have a specific example, right, attorney general jeff sessions said he chose to recuse because of his personal connections to people potentially implicated in the russia inquiry, relationships, coord...

This investigation. building on michaels questions, explain to all of us, and the public, if he were to have one, two, three meetings with the russian ambassador, whats the implication or seriousness of that in your mind or in the mind of some of your colleagues on the committee? >> he is the highest ranking official in the trump administration to be involved in these meetings, whether its two or three. he made false statements before the judiciary committee about them. he has yet to explain ful...

>> i cannot agree more. it was interesting to watch social media and the reaction to the selection. the commentary on the outcome was followed by, bernie would have one. i think thats a real implication on what people are feeling and frankly the frustration that has led us here. we opened the show by talking about the economy and who has gained under two different parties leading this country. it has not been the everyday people. i believe there is something like 70 or 80% turnout of young peopl...

Thanks for being with me and i want to start with the breaking news that you just heard. the secret service says they dont have any tapes of white house conversations to turn over. do you think the president could have a recording that the secret service doesnt know about? >> well, i think if he had a recording and it exonerated him, he wouldve made it public very, very quickly. so i think logically it does not appear that he has the tapes. now he continues to maintain that and hes the only one ...

>> i cannot agree more. it was interesting to watch social media and the reaction to the selection. the commentary on the outcome was followed by, bernie would have one. i think thats a real implication on what people are feeling and frankly the frustration that has led us here. we opened the show by talking about the economy and who has gained under two different parties leading this country. it has not been the everyday people. i believe there is something like 70 or 80% turnout of young peopl...