Page 694 - Implication News Today

Petraeus will give a blow by blow account of what happened in the deadly attack in benghazi that led to the death of four americans including the u.s. ambassador. director petraeus went to tripoli and interviewed many of the people as i understand that there were involved. >> there will be hearings in the benghazi attack. most closed to the public one was open. most of the focus is on u.s. ambassador susan rice who back in department appeared on five sunday talk shows with a talking point. it ap...

Or so after the election dispar rajjing romneys comments i think maybe was the kind of cover and restart button that they were looking for. >> you talk about new hampshire, iowa, wisconsin. there are not people looking for free stuff in those states, and obama won all states. >> on the substance, theres no point to it. it underscored the demographic challenge the republicans face competitive long term. you cant talk in boldly divisive terms like romney did in that tape and call. yes, i think it ...

Presented a person out loud that was trying, but inside perhaps i dont know. i cant speak to that. we can only play what he said. i want to play governor jindals response, a little bit of what he said. he said we have to stop dividing the american voters. we need to go after 100% of the votes, not 53%. we dont know from his words if he was angry or not, but we know he was passionate about pushing back. >> as well he should. when we look at mitt romney now, certainly theres no shame in losing an ...

Continues. its going to be a pretty big one going forward. >> did the president not indicate in that press conference by implication that his next nomination, his candidate for secretary of state, is susan rice? >> well, he seemed to be implying that. but i think it would be premature to say shes definitely the choice. you know, there are a lot of factors that go into this. john kerry is still, you know, a contender for this. he would also make a very good secretary of state. i want to go back t...

Mrs. kelleys friend in the f.b.i. decided to look into who was sending her this e-mail, and it was mrs. broadwell, if it started out for an improper reason, it didnt start out because the f.b.i. had evidence of criminal activity, which is what they supposed to have, then everything they found as a result of that investigation is questionable as to whether it could be used in any prosecution. the f.b.i. itself said, whoever leaked this stuff, there is no criminal or national security implication ...

The election. >> bob: i didnt. >> greg: that to me is more idiotic. it happened after the election, before he had to testify? >> andrea: say no one did tell the president, who is he going to fire over it? >> eric: funny you ask that question. hang in there, robert. coming up we delve deeper in implication of the scandal. two questions, is it believable that president obama didnt know about the investigation to general petraeus issues? is america safer now that he has been removed? thats next. �...

Rick: does he have any recourse here if we learn in the course of this investigation that the fbi did something wrong? >> yes. rick: general petraeus have any kind of legal recourse? >> yes, yes, there are numerous federal statutes that protect people from overreaching by the government. look if this thing was started because some fbi agent who took his shirt off and e-mailed a picture of himself to mrs. kelly i think her name is because he was her friend and wanted to do her a favor, reason bec...

Sense. and i understand the protocols. again, i respect the investigations. but this is a compromising situation which now, apparently, is expanding. and at the same time you had the cia director under an investigation while hes going to benghazi to determine what happened there. i mean, lets put all of this together. it doesnt look good. megyn: julian, and i will, ill give you the floor, but it sounds like jays making the argument just because in the e-mails there wasnt a security threat becaus...

Post-racist, yes. get the terms right. we should be post-racist, not enshrining one group with the implication theyre superior or the laws favor them. women rose up in mass and with their allies to say look, a bunch of old white guys deciding what women should do with their bodies is passe and ac crow nistic and hurtful. here it is that the supreme court, save one figure, clarence thomas, none have been subjected to these restrictions. none of them have been subject to the willie nilly impositio...

Whether there was any compromising of his statements or his professional activists. we dont know the answer to that question, but this is the optic through which lawmakers are now seeing the directors statements about benghazi and only director petraeus can explain why his position was so inconsistent with the intelligence available about benghazi and the statements made to lawmakers early that week by the f.b.i. and briefers from the national counter terrorism center. this is really going to th...