Page 717 - Implication News Today

Court, kyle, that it strikes down the entire law? >> i think theres a strong likelihood that that takes place, actually based on research ive done and people ive talked to. >> gary b, from a market perspective, a lot of jockeying and health care, medical device makers, what do you think the market impact will be, will it have a broader implication. >> a, i guess well know monday, b, will it have a solution, i think the big companies in the whole health care, pharmaceutical, are going to do well ...

Other. well see if it can be done. >> well see. oregon democratic senator john wyden, thank you for being here. i hope youre right. >> its the only way out. >> if youre watching this show while staying at a fanlsy resort in park city, utah, you might be a big time mitt romney donor in town to schmooze the candidate himself. you almost certainly are not a big time barack obama donor because there arent as many oz of the these days and that has a big implication where public policy is going to loo...

Times. theyve complied and this is clearly a political witch hunt and darrel issa says as much several months ago. >> reality and whats the perception of it is what im talking about here. theres no implication of the president -- no one is accusing that. dont you think for some it will look that way, what did he know? why are they covering this up? >> maybe people on the far right who believe that the president was born in kenya and is a muslim, yeah. for the most part, people will see this as a...

sandusky until just this week. as the trial was going on, he apparently approached prosecutors and told them that his adopted father did molest him. jason carroll, cnn contributor and sarah gannon. jason, if matt sanduskys claims was known by the prosecution, why didnt they call him to testify? >> well, i think its a good question. i think theres a question in terms of whether or not his testimony would have been admissible, for one reason, jerry sandusky is not charged with sexually a...

sandusky until just this week. as the trial was going on, he apparently approached prosecutors and told them that he was molested. jason, if matt sanduskys claims was known by the prosecution, why didnt they call him to testify? >> well, i think its a good question. i think theres a question in terms of whether or not his testimony would have been admissible, for one reason, jerry sandusky is not charged with sexually abusing his son. i can tell you this. think of this scenario. lets s...

prosecution during the trial. now, he was not called to the stand. were going to get into why in just a minute because thats of course the question everybody wants to know the answer to. first, a bit of background. he went to live with the sanduskies as a foster child. he was later adopted. he had denied ever being abused by sandusky till just this week. as the trial was going on, he apparently approached prosecutors and told them his adopted father did molest him. joining me now live ...

just a moment because thats the question everybody wants to know the answer to. matt sandusky is 33 years old now. he went to live with them as a foster child and he was later adopted. he denied ever being abused by sandusky until just this week. as the trial was going on, he apparently approached prosecutors and told them that he was molested. jason, if matt sanduskys claims was known by the prosecution, why didnt they call him to testify? >> well, i think its a good question. i think...

And false and specious. the stone walling that has gone on and of course the implication of this executive privilege which under scores something that those of us who have followed this for more than a year and a half now has always known and realized in our reporting of this. >> michelle will be on fox and friends with more reaction. you want to stick around with that. nancy pelosi is a big talker blasting republicans for the resolution saying karl rove could have been arrested over the bush ...

Whether the attorney general of the united states should be held in contempt. and now the white house, top right-hand side, is involved. joining us, gretchen hamel, executive director of public notice. juan williams, fox news political analyst. juan, this was just a battle between, i shouldnt say just, a battle, vigorous one, fought over many, many months, between congress and the attorney general but now because the president has invoked executive privilege he is sucked into it. what is the pol...

New level this morning, bill. this means that we may be on the verge of a constitutional confrontation between the white house and the congress. executive privilege is defined in the leading supreme court case, united states versus nixon, that is richard nixon that is the watergateer a the efforts ever the special prosecutors to subpoena tapes from president nixon as protecting conversations with the president himself. now the letter that eric holder wrote to the president saying please give me ...