Pilot program. Will we begin to analyze that and then no longer make those references and just call it a program and a budget item of the puc . Well, it does not address that specifically, and my hope is that as we move towards a customer, you know, a San Francisco customer, based program, that, that that will have the effect of terminating it. And i dont know if we ever need to make a formal declaration i think that if we are starting with our own customer its changes character and i think that the decision to go there says that we have already conclude and there is a benefit of it. And at that point,. And if i could clarify, just, to make sure that we have the common understanding of the facts. That the go Solar Program is a Program Statute did include a section that is a Pilot Program. That Pilot Program was for the first year. So that portion of the program that was characterized under the statute as pilot concluded. I think that we have come into the habit coming into it because t
So, eddie had proposed that we expand the Workforce Development to allow for that staffing and so that we can hire the 20 individuals through the state certified apprenticeship programs and i think that would be a positive thing. The main, we support getting the funding released as quickly as possible. And the solar installation we had a lot of pent up demand over the last few years because there has not been enough funding with the sorts of structure that existed and so we knew that the structure was a positive thing and we waited until october to start releasing letters, however, is very painful for the solar installers because we would have lost the entire summer and that, means that we wont be able to hire the staff up because at the point that we are starting to get the information letters, it will be a rainy season. Well it would be really nice to be able to use what happened in terms of the approval process that existed when csi commercial went out in trying to get that or get l
And annual report. And they will give us a very specific information and so that i think it gets us, very where we need to go and i dont expect, some of the boat house folks will be happy, with our saying that rec and park is responsible for recreation. But where we are going to disagree and i think that is an appropriate out come. And we have distributed with the package and we had the mlu and a resolution to put that in force. We have introduced some changes to the language of the mlu. And sitting next to our counsel, i have been handed an amendment to the resolution. Which will make the rest of it happen if i get this right. And that is your amendment is not in the resolution. It is not. But you are incorporating it if yeah. All right. So we are incorporating mr. Ritchis amendment and Vice President courtneys amendments . Yes. And the, just a minute. The word is. Right here. Okay. So, first of all, if i could move the item so that then i could move the amendment to it. Do you want t
Do their job, they should be fired. That is all that i have to tell you. All right thank you so much. It seems to me that the rec and parks responsibility to maintain and inspect from the pec to do so . We want to make sure that you know, all of these kinds of situations are indeed covered, and perhaps the details might not be, and but Something Like the inspection of property and maintenance, you know, property. And under the responsibility, you know that the funding will be provided to maintain the Public Access facilities. Right . I dont know if that is the right section, it is c5. Okay. I guess that my question is it anyones responsibility but the parks and is it responsibility for the puc to pay for the ongoing maintenance and inspection of facilities. I think in this case, i think that mr. Ginsberg can speak to it because the boat house is theirs. It is our responsibility to fix and it is that simple and i think that through the important i know that you are in a difficult positi
The habit coming into it because the legislation was for ten years. So i think that perhaps, folks are thinking of ten years and that is the pilot aspect of it. And the aspect of the program has concluded that the program and the funding our capitol plan for ten years total. I think that you would come up. And that is a concern of mine is and so now, i clearly understand it and i appreciate that and i only have one last clarification. And once we start to rule out whatever we are going to rule out from this point forward, there is going to be conversation and there is going to be labor components and we did get it back on how we will let that out and that will also be ape subject of these discussions and am i right . That is correct. The whole idea behind this is to bring our stake holders in the room and come up where they process where we can do solar on our own customers. And in a way that is ininclusive of all of the stake holder in all of the advocates and so we need to sit down a