Page 58 - Indefensible News Today

Kendis. i dont understand how in the world you can continue to justify not saying anything at least not saying well, hey, lets look into this and see where it grows. let the chips fall where they may, but do defend the indefensible is ridiculous. i think voters will demand more and more from some of the vulnerable republicans to, again, draw a line in the sand. theyll have to decide where do you stand on this? and if you dont stand on the right side, were going to vote you out. >> you can -- wha...

Troubling dangerous time for our country. you have president trump and his many republican enablers out there flailing, grasping for anything, any excuse to justify the indefensible. you know, this is not -- it is helpful to have a second whistleblower, another patriot, american patriot, risking his or her job in order to assure the preservation of our democracy. but this is not a political mystery. we have a star witness in this case. and that star witness is named donald trump. he has indicate...

Swing district and the maps get redrawn and maybe that more difficult, i think its going to be very hard to go out there, 4, 6 years from now and this is the opposition research who defended trump when he was doing the indefensible. >> the way you do it in politics is you change the question, of course im guilty, but what side are you on? they did it when trump or ronald reagan lost the first. the issue isnt when he had a lousy debate, sure he had a lousy debate. so you go down to the districts ...

Trump out of office. im not sure thats true. ive never thought thats true and i increasingly dont question whether thats true. you get to the senate, do you say, well, theres this one thing he should be removed from office over, i dont know. i think thats a hard argument to make. >> youre not seeing the kind of defensive posture from mitch mcconnell that if you were donald trump you would want to see right now? >> except for lindsey graham youre not seeing much defense of him at all in the senat...

Im not sure thats true. ive never thought its true, and i increasingly dont question whether thats true. you get to the senate, do you say well theres this one thing that we think he should removed from office over? i dont know. i think thats a hard argument to make. >> and youre not seeing the kind of defensive posture from mitch mcconnell that if you were donald trump you would want to see right now. >> except for lindsey graham youre not seeing very much for him at all in the senate. he says ...

Invasion of the body snatchers. who are these people? theyre unrecognizable to me. theyve lost all conscience and all moral compass in order to defend the indefensible. >> jim, the presidents former homeland security adviser who i think you know, tom bossert told abc not only is the substance of the presidents phone call with the ukrainian president problematic but the president has to get over his debunked conspiracy theory of the 2016 election involving ukraine. do you agree with what bossert ...

Profiteering from the presidency. and then, you know, youve got my old friend, lindsey graham, who -- who really crosses the rubicon of hypocrisy. and there is so much video, so many -- so many clips of lindsey saying during clinton exactly the opposite of what he is saying now. youve got rudy giuliani, who used to be the top u.s. attorney in new york. he was the law, now seeming absolutely lawless and crazy and just making the most unsubstantiated claims. so when i look at it, some of these peo...

>> and to give you a full sense of it, katy, i have to tell you the day before the white house released that summary of the presidents interaction with his ukrainian counterpart i asked a number of republican senators how they viewed the white house taking that step and the ones who opposed it said publicly that they didnt like the idea of the bad precedent that it would set. they said that any foreign leader should be able to have a private conversation with this president or any other presiden...

Understandable desires and reasons. we had those when we left iraq and iraq was a much more stable situation at that time, sadly undone by the very prime minister we helped during the search to reduce the violence by some 85 or 90%. but that was questionable. this would be, i think, indefensible, again, unless there are some real ironclad verification measures in the agreement. >> martha: how many troops do you believe -- 8600 is the number that has been discussed. so if you wanted to lower the ...

Microphone and then they still figure out a way to try to defend the indefensible. anyway, you were talking about guy benson. >> the editor for ton hall.com tweeted and just like that he yanks the carpet out from underneath everyone who claimed he actually meant something else. >> so, willie, this is dual loyalty, its how fascinating that here is a guy that ran through anti-semitic troupes through his entire campaign, talked to jewish groups talking about money, how basically they were money gru...