Page 90 - Indefensible News Today

Because he is a victim of circumstance. >> oh, no, no, no. >> he looks foolish, he dodges, he weaves, he doesnt answer, he accuses our guys of -- fox, oh yeah, they are asking legitimate questions. >> he is quite patronizing and very thin-skinned but so his boss. >> stay on carney. so you are telling me that i think he looks foolish, i do too. thats my opinion. jay carney looks foolish. you disagree. you dont think he looks foolish to the folks watching? >> in particular on obama care? >> oh yea...

There are people it appears to be they are losers and shouldnt be political footballs for republicans and shouldnt be ignored by democrats. we need to fix obama care, upgrade obama care but right now everybody is scoring political points and nothing is getting done. >> i think van does as good a job as anyone can of defending the indefensible. this is a simple question, the president of the united states on thousands of occasions said you will not lose your insurance, you will not lose your doct...

Two months ago a judge ruled that the stop and frisk program of the new york city police department was unconstitutional. and since then its supporters have been scrambling to defend the indefensible. today an appeals court stayed the ruling. and we will be carefully watching where the case goes. it makes it even more important we are clear about the facts. unlike former mayor rudy giuliani who went on fox news last night. >> the reality is that stop and frisk and four or five other programs tha...

>> what do you think, greg? >> chris matthews saying you have a credibility issue is like mike tyson saying you have a tattoo on your face problem. >> thoughts? >> i think at some point these reporters are interested in covering their own burkts and can you not defend the indefensible so even chris matthews is saying whose credibility is more important, mine or barrys. ill do mine insgled go ahead, robert. >> first of all, i think robert should not have -- i mean, would i not -- you never make a...

For many decades has been to insulate the fed from political pressure. it used to be it would be dismiss the out of hand. its none of your business, congress. thats the whole reason we, together, set up the fed. so what gives? >> oh, its just a really unfortunate discussion. i mean, in no small part because these two candidates, summers and yellen, are not nearly as far apart as this frenzy weve been through in the last few weeks would lead you to believe. the white house played this very badly....

Its not just me who says this. i want to read one quote by the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. general dempsey, he said our military force is so degraded and unready, it would be immoral to use force. thats exactly what theyre talking about doing, is using force. >> congressman king, we keep hearing and in fact, we hear from secretary kerry, from the president himself, how war weary the congress, rather the country is. what do you think of the chances that congress will reject the use of ...

I want to read one quote by the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, general dempsey. he said our military force is so degraded and unready it would be immoral to use force. thats exactly what theyre talking about doing and using force. >> congressman king, we keep hearing, and in fact we hear from secretary kerry, from the president himself, how war-weary the congress -- the country is. what do you think of the chances that congress will reject the use of force and if they were to do that, go...

Video. combat outpost keating, tucked in a valley surrounded by towering mountains. up to 400 insurgents used the high ground to stage an overwhelming assault on just 53 u.s. troops. >> every kind of weapon they could get their hands on they were throwing us. we hadnt seen that before. >> reporter: eight u.s. soldiers were killed that day. but there were heart stopping heroics to defend the base. one has already been given the nations highest honor for his bravery in the face of overwhelming odd...

Questioned how you defend the indefensible. if its competent and good defense does that raise the idea the killer could go free, if he is a killer. the same principle in a different boston massacre, 1770, a different enemy, british captain preston was accused of ordering his soldiers to kill five civilians and wounding many others. while at the time many did not think he deserved a trial or lawyer, preston was represented by one of the best american advocates of the day, john adams. paul brought...

>> i dont defend the indefensible. thats whats tiring, watching people to try to contort themselves into ways to defend statements that are indefensible. you can disagree with the party, calm people out, and still agree with them on a whole host of issues and still work together as a party and a movement to advance conservative causes. but we have to stop defending the indefensible and call a spade a spade. these were stupid things to say. >> se cupp, great to see you. be sure to catch "the cycl...