use it think it this woman should never. women who use it think it is this woman should never. women who use it think it is a this woman should never. women who use it think it is a disaster? this woman should never. women who use it think it is a disaster? a this woman should never. women who use it think it is a disaster? a lot - use it think it is a disaster? a lot of women use it think it is a disaster? a lot of women who use it think it is a disaster? a lot of women who have use it think it is a disaster? a lot of women who have used - use it think it is a disaster? a lot of women who have used it - use it think it is a disaster? a lot of women who have used it to i use it think it is a disaster? a lot of women who have used it to think it is a of women who have used it to think it is a disaster. and it is a disaster it is a disaster. and it is a disaster in it is a disaster. and it is a disaster in this case, particularly, because disaster in this
really sorry. given a threshold is 24 weeks. i am really sorry. this given a threshold is 24 weeks. i am really sorry, this is given a threshold is 24 weeks. i am really sorry, this is really really sorry, this is really important and people will be watching this and will be rightly distressed because this is a distressing case but that simply is not what the evidence said. it was not what the evidence said. it was not proven the child had drawn a breath. one thing that is important about this is because the other legislation involved was the infant preservation act of 1929, which sets out the timetable so removing the offence against the person, which says you can have life imprisonment for an abortion and remember, an average of 18 months for a violent offence so this woman has had a much tougher offence than sentence than most people who commit violent offences but that does not specify a time limit, it simply says abortion is wrong and illegal and that is why this prosec