presidential immunity. in a monumental decision for presidential powers, the court ruled that former president trump is immune from prosecution over official acts. they specified he does not have immunity for unofficial acts. the decision has massive implications for presidential powers in the criminal cases against donald trump. hello, everyone. this is outnumbered. i m kayleigh mcenany here is my cohost, emily compagno. also joining us, kennedy saves the world podcast host, kennedy, rebeccah heinrichs, and former assistant u.s. attorney, andy mccarthy. but we begin at the supreme court where fox news sunday houston fox news chief legal correspondent shannon bream is standing by with details on the historic ruling. shannon? kayleigh, you heard it this morning. it breaks down this way. the court says that there is absolute and presumptive immunity for president for the official or core acts of his presidency. they say that does not extend to criminal activity part of
A look at the days news and headlines. Manafort into paying his American Express bill and may have fraudulently submitted personal expenses to be paid by the trump inaugural committee. The defense team says they exposed him as unreliable. After all the laws youve told you expect this jury to believe you . Gates said im here to tell the truth and take responsibility for my actions. Mr. Manafort had the same path. I am trying to change. He says if there are charges of financial funny businessman fort always knew where the money was. The judge jumped in to say manafort wasnt that great knowing where his money was if gates was able to steal as much as he was admitted to stealing. Gates was told that the Manafort Defense Team will have at least another hours worth of questioning for him this morning starting at 9 30 local
time. We dont know who the mueller teams next witness would be that they might call. We know they plan to wrap up their case, rest their case sometime this week. Sandra. S
actions within his constitutional prerogative if he does them with corrupt intent. i happen to think that s a flawed legal theory. if you buy it, then obviously president trump is an important witness in terms of the operation of his mind when he took these actions. sandra: trump s lawyers leaning towards no on the sit-down. political implications but that s the right move in your view. i think so. he is the president. an inferior executive officer which mueller is shouldn t be able to question the president. sandra: great to have you on the program this morning. bill. bill: breaking news on the search for mollie tibbetts, she has been missing for three weeks. brand-new video from the day before mollie went missing is now public. matt finn back live in brooklyn, iowa. what can we learn from this new
impeached. so let s go to the subpoena issue. how far can they take a subpoena, if, in fact, they conclude, as the department of justice did, you cannot indict a sitting president? how does the subpoena process work? see, i think this goes back to david s point, mark, you know, these guys are not an independent fourth branch of government, right? mueller technically is an inferior executive officer. i don t know on what authority, if the president doesn t want to be subpoenaed, how does the inferior executive officer tell the chief executive, we re going to subpoena you anyway? and i think this goes to two points. one is this is more of a political issue than a legal issue. you know, trump could terminate this whole thing now if he wanted to as chief executive. he doesn t do that because of the political fallout, not because legally he doesn t have the authority to do it, and
impeached. so let s go to the subpoena issue. how far can they take a subpoena, if, in fact, they conclude, as the department of justice did, you cannot indict a sitting president? how does the subpoena process work? see, i think this goes back to david s point, mark, you know, these guys are not an independent fourth branch of government, right? mueller technically is an inferior executive officer. i don t know on what authority, if the president doesn t want to be subpoenaed, how does the inferior executive officer tell the chief executive, we re going to subpoena you anyway? and i think this goes to two points. one is this is more of a political issue than a legal issue. you know, trump could terminate this whole thing now if he wanted to as chief executive. he doesn t do that because of the political fallout, not because legally he doesn t have the authority to do it, and