Page 9 - Information Overload News Today

Mueller, the contents of this memo do not in any way discredit his investigation. do you agree with that? >> i dont have enough information that these congressmen are privy to a lot more than i am. like so many americans, i look at this, i hear what the democrats say, what the republicans say and then hear with a journalists like you say, and it becomes very muddy for individuals like myself who really pay attention because of so much information overload and what the real truth is. >> so brent,...

The show and watching the news conference, you were appalled at how many red flags they stood up there and told us there were and this attack still played out. >> andrew: they told us the attack was planned for weeks. that means he used his mobile device, he spoke to people, he communicated with people, he purchased goods, he rented the truck. how could intelligence agents have not picked this up with weeks of planning when the nsa supposedly exists for safety and captures everything we say and ...

Have such a pc culture and until development and you cant just go after people you suspect, looking at a broader picture you can tell who is doing these things, young men from certain areas that might be citizens in a country that developed and radicalized in that country but a basic idea that you can narrow down. the judge was indicating we had so much data coming in, so much intelligence about good people, they would be able to tell if you did any profiling, you would not be bringing in this d...

You can make anybody look ridiculous, even bad by selectively editing the conversation and revealing it as if it were the whole conversation. steve: sure, by statute, this is legal. you can -- the nsa can collect all the data and we think its just regarding, as was mentioned in this case a russian authority, but they record everything for all of us. >> correct. now, i have argued that such a statute, a, is unconstitutional and b, is information overload. too much data for the nsa to analyze. whi...

These two orders, when were not just followed by bush but were followed by barack obama and trump. it unleashes the agency to spy all the time. the argument is, we need to capture everything from everyone and we will sift through it. its the only way to keep america safe. >> shepard: information should be damned. >> its information overload. they realize they had the cell phone calls from the san bernardino murders and the orlando murder took place after they took place. they have such informati...

From europe. inside country buildings without surveillance. ainsley: why didnt they catch this guy. >> they are suffering from the same thing we suffer here. two things, information overload and the use of surveillance to investigate and prosecute rather than to prevent. before the surveillance, the police were more active in the community and if some crackpot was contemplating this. they would have heard it or gotten a whiff of it or had some suspicion about it. now, when they spend more of the...

And less reliance on information overload. too much data coming in to the police to sift it out. not based on suspicion but based on lets get everything we can from everybody. steve: there are apparently 3500 terrorists under surveillance in great britain. however, you know, obviously, they just are stretched so thinly. >> yes. steve: you have got to wonder whether or not whoever and apparently they have figured out hot bomber is. they have not released the persons name is you have got to wonder...

Do you ever think that you are contributing to that confusion? >> well, i dont think i wholeheartedly said hey, here is the evidence. i said hey, a fisa warrant was issued. so there was surveillance they were looking at in some form or fashion. whether thats a wiretap, i cant tell you. but what i can tell you is a lot of people are in information overload -- >> does it matter to you that the senate intelligence committee said there is no evidence, they have found no evidence that trump tower was...

Shoe is going to drop. >> who is responsible for that confusion? do you think you are for trying to make sense of something that doesnt make sense, defending indefensible. do you think maybe you and other people should say maybe the president shouldnt tweet something there appears to be no factual evidence at this point? instead of saying fisa warrant and this and that, nothing at all to do with what the president originally said. do you ever think youre contributing to that confusion? >> i dont...

Heat streak. >> those articles dont say what they said but sorry. andre. go on. >> that was jack. >> no you. i wanted you to jump in on that. >> crickets. >> i got the floor. >> now crickets. nows your chance or move on to jen psaki. >> first thing i would say, we fwhoe there was fisa warrant given in october but more than that don, i watch a lot of cnn and i think the average person watching tv, no matter what channel, almost like they cant tell you difference between iraq and iran. theres so m...