And commissioner wilson and commissioners commissioner sommer is excused we have a quorum. Next ill administrator administer the oath of it was will all parties please stand and raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear or affirm the testimony youre about to give will be the whole truth and nothing but the truth . Thank you you may be seated. And next, we have our land acknowledgement. Acknowledgement. Unceded ancestral homeland of the ramaytush rahmytoosh ohlone olonee who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco peninsula. Responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. Ramaytush ohlone community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. Thank you. Um, next for the Public Comment call in information my members attending remotely. Public comment callin 1 415 6550001 access code 2661 668 3773. To raise your hand for Public Comment on a specific agenda item press 3 star three when prompte
Gary, the boards legal assistant is at the controls. Engineer joined by representatives by City Departments who have cases tonight. We have the assistant zoning administratedder and hes here representing the Plan Department and commission. Well be joined shortly by senior building inspector joseph duffy and also well have representatives here from the department the citys arts commission. The board requests that you turn off or silence all phones or Electronic Devices so they do not disturb proceedings and you carry on conversations in the hallway. The boards rules are as follows appellants and permit holders are given 7 minutes and three minutes for rebuttal and people affiliated must include comments within these periods. Members of the public not affiliated with the parties have three minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal. We ask you speak into the microphone. To assist in minutes, youre required to commit a speaker card. Speaker cards are available on the left side of t
I did review the 311 notice and the plans that were provided by the neighbor. It was clear that the notice itself was the new notice from 2017. It clearly stated it was going to four stories. The plans that they have are the old plans from 2013, 2014. I have no way of knowing if those are the plans that were included with that notice last year because those plans were only dated as to when they were, you know, drawn by the designer. Not when they were mailed out or included in the 311 packet. So i cant corroborate that is the those are the actual plans that were sent with that 311 notice, whether thats the truth or not. All i do know that issue was not raised in the appeal. It was not raised in a brief. It has not been raised by any neighbors to our knowledge to either the project sponsor or the department staff. That includes potentially being raised by the neighbor to the north who originally dred the project and chose not to dr it based on revised plans. In order to get anymore info
Keeping hard copies of jobs that go out in terms how long they keep those physical documents. I havent had a chance to request that. Because it appears that the transmittal of information from the Planning Department to repo mill were correct. That is the only kind of area that we havent been able to explore thoroughly yet. I want to follow up the 3 11 notice has a description that referenced a four story project. It definitely referenced the newer plans. They are not what the old plans were, as mentioned. Thank you. Commissioners the matter is submitted. Time is over. I will start. One, it is really difficult to hear a case just orally, and that is why briefs are submitted and had certain questions been asked maybe some of those could have been answered here this evening. Other than that, i feel that this is a conforming project. It has gone on a long time there. Are no exemptions, no rare variances required. I feel a reason to deny the appeal and accept the project as it is. So if th
Consider the institutional master plan and no need for anything further ill be happy to answer any questions katherine from the conservatory is here. Opening it up for Public Commentcomment. Sue hester this is a way the institutional master plan is supposed to work you youve had them from California College of arts and crafts conservatory and a couple of other institutions relatively painless this one is struggling to build housing in a principle manner on the site right next to the academy of the art what that handout is is the land holding the academy of art is looking to build more youll find 150 they see as their future administrative haurtdz you are headquarters a block from city hall and i submitted comments that have been considered that was before even i know about the plans to do housing on the other side of the 0 lot line you have a responsibility to take the institutional master plan seriously where there is a Housing Demand from the students from the people their meeting it