all of this develop is when you re a reporter, a, you re skeptical of people in power, right? you get lied to all the time. i remember the first time i got lied to by an alderman, he looked me in the face and lied. i was like, he just lied to me. it is a radicalizing, important moment in the trajectory of being a reporter, right? you always care it carry it with you. statement you develop relationships of the rest where you can go to them and say, am i wrong, where are we on this? that relationship for trust is so gone here, seriously, that everyone is floating in a dark ocean where there s nothing to anchor or moor you against the crazy information. it is breaking down for a few reasons, right? one is that the normal information process in the white house is breaking down. totally. his own staff isn t always in the loop on things. which is hugely important. even if you develop a relationship of trust with someone in the white house, they
all of this develop is when you re a reporter, a, you re skeptical of people in power, right? you get lied to all the time. i remember the first time i got lied to by an alderman, he looked me in the face and lied. i was like, he just lied to me. it is a radicalizing, important moment in the trajectory of being a reporter, right? you always care it carry it with you. at the same time, you do develop relationships of trust with individuals where you can go to them and say, am i wrong, where are we on this? that relationship for trust is so gone here, seriously, that everyone is floating in a dark ocean where there s nothing to anchor or moor you against the crazy information. it is breaking down for a few reasons, right? one is that the normal information process in the white house is breaking down. totally. his own staff isn t always in the loop on things. which is hugely important. even if you develop a relationship of trust with someone in the white house, they may not know a
on the veracity of the wall street story. they basically were saying that at this stage there s nothing more to say. if there was an opportunity to further the story, it could happen later today some time. but as far as actually confirming or denying anything that was said in that story overnight, they wouldn t talk about that. all that we re doing really, i suppose, is telling you the technology that s in that system and the way it would normally operate. richard. guy, i m not in any shape or form disagreeing or disputing what you said. but i m going to put the opposite position. one of my sources very close to rolls-royce said exactly the opposite, that there is no data there is no data and that the journal article s wrong. i ll tell you something, it fits beautifully with the way the information process has been
happens and then suddenly everything happens. things are happening already. three years ago people didn t use social networks. now it s overflowing governments. we get used to the changes very quickly. ultimately we ll reprogram our own biology which is an information process. we have computer software process called genes. we need to update them. the idea is getting more and more powerful. the key point is intuition about the future is linear. it s a profound difference. the idea we ll have to augment our intelligence with computers, how do you see this? my view is, why can t we just control or shout down or draw back the computers a little bit? well i say computers but i mean technology. you mentioned you have three devices in front of you. so as they become more powerful, if we don t become a part of them, they will become so powerful they would live their own lives. we need to merge with our machines. we ve always used them to extend
i was like, he just lied to me. it is a radicalizing, important moment in the trajectory of being a reporter, right? you always care it carry it with you. statement you develop relationships of the rest where you can go to them and say, am i wrong, where are we on this? that relationship for trust is so gone here, seriously, that everyone is floating in a dark ocean where there s nothing to anchor or moor you against the crazy information. it is breaking down for a few reasons, right? one is that the normal information process in the white house is breaking down. totally. his own staff isn t always in the loop on things. which is hugely important. even if you develop a relationship of trust with someone in the white house, they may not know anything. right. and the second thing is there s so much factionalism in the white house people are constantly selling stories against their own inside the