insult that is very personal not just to the person receiving the insult but the person who is the insulter. an insult is a projection and you are taking something that you yourself is in secure about, and you put it on somebody else and it feels personal because it is personal and it s not just personal about the person receiving the insult but it s about the insecurity of the person giving the insult. if you wanted to do a psychological profile of trump go go. and so maybe there is a level of insecurity about what trump is going through right now, and in a way projecting this you know in a way it puts him on top of the false hierarchy in a way but it s probably based on something deep within himself. so i want to get your perspective and also there is the response right? we have a couple responses to
him senate majority leader the leader of the serial insulter. greta, i have said. this i have never made a friend by calling them a name. and i have never fixed anything by blaming something else. when i was governor, we used to bring people together. the bottom line is which is a profession that we understand is public service and it should be all about public service. and you have to understand the other person s perspective where they re coming from. you never put your adversary in a position that they don t have a little respect going home. you never do that because youner get them back. and everybody has a different style, i guess, and we all have to move forward. well, i hope that the bipartisan committee can help us out a little bit more. we are going to stay together. we are not going to disband. remember, we just all met afterwards. we are going to it stay together. this thing has to get done. december 15th is when we are supposed to, the budget committee is supposed to
communist. i think what would make him say such a thing as that, is that he has a need to vilify and demonize the other. when you talk about debbie wasserman schultz who is his colleague from florida was talking about how they need to have a solid front for seniors, and so on medicare, she pointed out that he wouldn t support that. he did not debate her on the issue. he personally attacked her and said, she was not a lady. this guy is a serial insulter. he does this because i think to focus on what the job of a member of congress is is to solve problems, is something he is not interested in doing. i hope the people of the 22nd congressional district of florida take note about how he is always in the middle of one outrageous controversy or another. and that he never seems to get around dealing with the problems that they face on a daily basis. yet in all seriousness, sarah
pain and misery of mr. murdoch and the people that work there. at the same time, if you looked at the front page of the wall street journal, splash, big story, three more stories inside. you have an editorial you re ganging up on us, but your own paper, biggest, most important business paper in the world sought it fit to publish four hard-hitting stories about it. right after the chain saw line, while being insulted by it i admired the insulter. they want they, they want their read toers believe based on no evidence that the to be loid excesses of one publications tarnished thousands of news corp. journalists across the world, making the case immediately the isolated of the crime makes it key of the importance. free floating nation state that operates by its own rules
away. the wall street journal today suggesting that people like you, people like me, are far too interested in and we are engaging by taking joy in the pain and misery of mr. murdoch and the people that work there. at the same time, if you looked at the front page of the wall street journal, splash, big story, three more stories inside. you have an editorial saying you re ganging up on us. well, hey, your own paper, the biggest, most important business paper in the world, saw fit to publish four big hard-hitting stories about it. right after the chain saw line, which i thought was a great line, while being insulted by it i admired the insulter. in the same paragraph, you get, they want they, you and i and the rest of the media they want us to believe based on no evidence that the publication somehow tarnished thousands of other news corp journalists