Page 94 - Intelligence Experts News Today

>> i think there is a possibility that there was a bomb on board and were taking that very seriously. >> this, as a u.s. official tells cnn there had been chatter about bomb capabilities prior to the crash and after the crash, an official telling cnn, isis terrorists were bragging about the crash and having specific conversations about the bombs origin. leading intelligence experts to believe a bomb took down 9268. an insider suggests that a bomb was placed on the plane. the government has halte...

Furthermore, there was not even on the morning of september 11th, while chris stevens and sean smith were at the compound, chris had spoken with intelligence experts. there was no credible, actionable threat known to our intelligence community -- >> yes, maam -- >> -- against our compound. >> reclaiming my time. you said that ambassador chris was pulled out of tripoli because of threats on his life? >> there were threats from people associated with gadhafi after the publication of cables he had ...

Furthermore, there was not even on the morning of september 11th, while chris stevens and sean smith were at the compound, chris had spoken with intelligence experts, there was no credible actionable threat known to our intelligence community against our compound. >> reclaiming my time, you said that the ambassador was pulled out of tripoli because of threats on his life. >> there were threats from people associated with gadhafi after the publication of cables he had written that were made publi...

My career. but the reason he got to the server and the e-mails is because hillary lied and said she had no benghazi e-mails. when you find out sidney bloomingthal has them, she lied. thats her fault. not his. >> i think if there was anything on benghazi at this point given the leaks from this committee, we would have heard about it. >> no. there are no leaks you know why -- >> we do. they always leak who testifies. >> give me five names. >> -- mentioned in your -- >> give me five names. >> chery...

Server and the e-mails is because hillary lied and said she had no benghazi e-mails. hes following the evidence where its taking him. so when you find out sidney blumenthal has e-mails from hillary on benghazi, she lied. so therefore, we have to keep digging. thats her fault, not his. >> i think if there was anything on benghazi at this point given the leaks of this committee, we would have heard about it. >> no, there are no -- >> they always leak who testified. >> give me five names. >> you me...

But the reason he got to the server and the e-mails is because hillary lied and said she had no benghazi e-mails. hes following the evidence where its taking him. so when you find out sidney blumenthal has e-mails from hillary on benghazi she lied. so therefore, we have to keep digging. thats her fault, not his. >> i think if there was anything on benghazi at this point given the leaks of this committee, we would have heard about it. >> no, there are no -- >> they always leak who testified. >> g...

Server and the e-mails is because hillary lied and said she had no benghazi e-mails. hes following the evidence where its taking him. so when you find out sidney blumenthal has e-mails from hillary on benghazi, she lied. so therefore, we have to keep digging. thats her fault, not his. >> i think if there was anything on benghazi at this point given the leaks of this committee, we would have heard about it. >> no, there are no -- >> they always leak who testified. >> give me five names. >> you me...

Server and the e-mails is because hillary lied and said she had no benghazi e-mails. hes following the evidence where its taking him. so when you find out sidney blumenthal has e-mails from hillary on benghazi, she lied. so therefore, we have to keep digging. thats her fault, not his. >> i think if there was anything on benghazi at this point given the leaks of this committee, we would have heard about it. >> no, there are no -- >> they always leak who testified. >> give me five names. >> you me...

Afghan forces and lead them on the ground and we passed over to let the afghan forces take the lead. helping with the heavy lift capacity and helping to rush large members of troops and equipment. the air strikes will be in assistance, but only up to a point. this is a town. there are civilians who live there. about 250 casualties we know of. no one will want to endanger the civilians. taliban made it clear to their fighters, dont kill the civilians. there will be a limit to what the u.s. can do...

Some of the intelligence experts at the highest levels, and we think theyre assembling a nuclear weapon the military option is absolutely on the table, sean. all im saying we dont know what things will be like in 18 months. we can say everything we want to say. at the end of the day, if any of those things get violated we go back to sanctions and on the moral high ground to talk to our allies about working with us. i dont like this deal at all. dont agree with it. >> they will get it up front al...