carriers. bret: not that they didn t have a nuclear capability? exactly. bret: what happens from here? well, hopefully this becomes not the story of the hour. the story of the day. and we can get on campaigning. getting mr. cain s vision for america across to the voters. you know, i ve been asked, bret, did this have a detrimental effect on our campaign. i think if you take a look at the poll numbers that have come out in the last 24 hours, we ve either maintained or increased his intensity factor has gone up. and we have had our best fundraising day yet, yesterday, that we had in the campaign. obviously, it s not hurting with us our supporters. bret: mr. block, thank you for the time. thank you for having me. bret: we ll have more on the cain story with the fox all-stars and on special report online. 7:00 p.m. eastern. obviously, all the 2012 election news. foxnews.com/sronline. when we come back, a startling prediction from the federal reserve chairman about unemploym
democrat or republican at the top of the field who did not know that nuclear wes have been in the hands of the chinese for 50 years. he is at the top of the field in some polls and certainly the intensity factor out in iowa in the caucus poll where he really is lapping mitt romney in terms of caucus goers. it says something about how the whole campaign has evolved, about us in the media. and also, obviously the domestic focus. the appropriate domestic focus on our economy at the same time there are certain, you know basic foreign policy credentials you ve got to have if you re going to be president. and yet, if you look at the washington post today, iowa supporters rallying around him. he s one point behind mitt romney in a florida poll we re going to be showing in a minute. he is right now, you would have to put him as the front-runner for the gop. no doubt about çthat. he is woefully ill prepared to be commander in chief. i think what herman cain
and i have to believe that while this was a wisconsin fight, and wisconsin grassroots work hes and teachers really let it, that a visit from the president simply saying that he believed in fairness, he believed in collective bargaining, he believed that it is valuable to keep an open and free government, not one with late night meetings and violations of open meetings laws, i think a statement like that while seen as partisan by his critics would have been a rallying cry for people who respect and value his leadership. i can t help but think there s a disconnect between the white house and what s happening in the heartland. how could they miss it s terrible. do you think there s a disconnect? it s a terrible disconnect, ed. and it s not a disconnect purely of coming or going, and things like that, there s also an intensity factor. in wisconsin, you had people who literally couldn t sleep at night. they stayed up late, they made calls, wrote letters, knocked on doors, passed p
he did not come to wisconsin in march or april or may or june or july or august. and i have to believe that while this was a wisconsin fight, and wisconsin grassroots work hes and teachers really let it, that a visit from the president simply saying that he believed in fairness, he believed in collective bargaining, he believed that it is valuable to keep an open and free government, not one with late night meetings and violations of open meetings laws, i think a statement like that while seen as partisan by his critics would have been a rallying cry for people who respect and value his leadership. i can t help but think there s a disconnect between the white house and what s happening in the heartland. how could they miss it s terrible. do you think there s a disconnect? it s a terrible disconnect, ed. and it s not a disconnect purely of coming or going, and things like that, there s also an intensity factor. in wisconsin, you had people who literally couldn t sleep at night
the trends, intensity factor, utter disaster of democratic rule, i think anything can happen. you are urging people to be a little more cautious. you don t want to dammen dampen enthusiasm. on one hand do you have blind rain throughout the country. in the senate you have really blue states. washington, oregon, california, new york. they are not good states for us. sean: and delaware. and connecticut i m happy to see linda mcmahon, though not my number one choice, she crushing blumenthal and she deserves to. sean: you are optimistic republicans will take over the house. what do you see in the senate? i never thought we could take the statement. the senate. by the way establishment republicans not whining about christine o donnell. sean: who would have thought russ feingold would be down eight points? that s a good example.