Latest Breaking News On - International mobile subscriber - Page 2 : vimarsana.com

So, unfortunately im constrained in what i can say, of course, about it. But what i can say is as in the Amnesty International case and in the Supreme Court, its plaintiffs burden to demonstrate and they failed to do so here, not only because their theory as subscribers of Verizon Wireless, which they cannot substantiate the District Court acknowledged theres no evidence that Verizon Wireless participated, but also because the injury that they assert is not based on the mere collection of metadata itself but the possibility that the government metadata to that compile information about the acvities of these particular plaintiffs. If there is an invasion of privacy by the collection of the metadata and the Supreme Court in jones recognizes even in the opinion of the court that it is the protected interest under the Fourth Amendment, then is it necessary that they show any misuse against them or is the collection by itself an invasion of privacy sufficient to meet that element of standin

United statesDistrict of columbiaJones pointNew yorkBaltimore countyRhode islandCapitol hillVerna jonesPaul lepageSam brownbackSylvia burwellScott walkerAlan greenblattTerry mcauliffeCharlie cristCindy cohen