Rigorous comments from many, many commenters who said you know this is terrible, you need to go to title 2. He points to what changed, what he learned in the interim, its that four million, he says, commenters said we want title 2 and so did the president. But i think, at least from my per spektsive as a prak tigs to space, the key issue for chairman wheeler would be whether he explains it well enough in the dock et when hes faced with an apel lat court thats reviewing that. It kind of gets me to my earlier point that this rulemaking itself is not in a vacuum. Its actually a remanned essentially, from the verizon case, which itself was a reaction to the comcast case before that. Ed. So its not without a fwraet deal of prior work that hes operating. I think thats an interpretation. Not everyone is in agreement that the court invited the commission to classify for the sole purpose of getting together to regulate a noncommon carrier as a carrier under title 2. And we can debate it endless
Broad gains become less to pointless ovation in fewer options for consumers. Put simply the plan to regulate the internet is not the solution to the problem. His plan is a problem. This order impose is intrusive regulation that will solve problems headon exist using Legal Authority the sec does not have. Accordingly i dissent. The commissions decision to adopt the president s plan marks a monumental shift to government control of the internet. Eight gives the fcc the power to micromanage every aspect of how it works this overreach to leave their washington bureaucracy not the people decide a future of the online world. One facet of that control is rate regulation for the first time the fcc will regulate the rates by as peas may charge and will set a price at zero for certain commercial arrangements. It goes out of its way from section two 01 authorization of rate authorization express the invites them to file complaints with the commission. A Government Agency deciding if a rate is law
Cspan, cspan2, cspan radio and cspan. Org. Bob erlich was in henniker, New Hampshire where he held a town hall meeting at new england college. The former governor who is considered a president ial run in 2016 discussed political discourse in washington the importance of compromise and his views on marriage. This is just over an hour. [multiply conversations taking place] [multiply conversations taking place] [multiply conversations taking place] good afternoon, everyone, on behalf of the center for sieving engagement i mind like to welcome you to the new england college. I am a Political Science major and it is my pleasure to introduce governor bob erlich. He has served as governor member of Congress State legislature and civil litigator. Most recently he advised clients on an array of Government Matters with focus on health care, finance and economic development. As marylands first republican governor in 36 years when elected he turned four billion in deficit into two billion in surpl
I do not ask this as a politician. As dakota was suggesting. I ask as one of so many mothers of a combat vet. When my son went off to war the first time as a teenager, i was confronted with the same reality that all the other moms have to face and just realizing, i was not going to be there to help, to protect. Moms cant be there when they hurt. I can pray, and i did and i do. But fewer things are more difficult than to kiss a child goodbye. Those first deployments is when a parent goes from calling him son to calling him sir. America hands over her sons and daughters in service with the promise they are going to be taken care of. Our troops are promised no one will be left kind. They are promised that a grateful nation will spare no expense to patch them up and bring them back to health when wounded. And now they come home wounded. Too many broken in body and spirit. Well we their mothers and their fathers and their house and their weives, we are here to collect on the promises made.
Millions of often autogenerated, very short and not particularly or in anyway, rigorous comments from many, many commenters who said you know this is terrible, you need to go to title 2. He points to what changed, what he learned in the interim, its that four million, he says, commenters said we want title 2 and so did the president. But i think, at least from my per spektsive as a prak tigs to space, the key issue for chairman wheeler would be whether he explains it well enough in the dock et when hes faced with an apel lat court thats reviewing that. It kind of gets me to my earlier point that this rulemaking itself is not in a vacuum. Its actually a remanned essentially, from the verizon case, which itself was a reaction to the comcast case before that. Ed. So its not without a fwraet deal of prior work that hes operating. I think thats an interpretation. Not everyone is in agreement that the court invited the commission to classify for the sole purpose of getting together to regula